- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 4,156
- Reaction Score
- 15,058
There have been threads on roster attrition, but there is another important issue: the number of commitments each year. In other words, is the team bringing in enough recruits to make up for all kinds of attrition such as injuries, academics, team violations, transfers, coaching changes...?
Using the Rivals database, I looked at the number of commitments to a school by year. There are some issues with the data such as JC transfers and some commits never signed or never showed up. But, the numbers provide some valuable insight.
I focused on the 2010, 2011, and 2012 recruiting years. These would be the RS Seniors, Seniors, RS Juniors, Juniors, and RS Sophomores this year. In other words, what should be the core of your team. The results confirm that UConn had a low number of commitments relative to other schools. In fact, I could only find a couple of FBS schools (although I didn't calculate every one) that had a lower number of commitments during the three years.
When I look at the numbers, it seems UConn did not bring in enough recruits to account for multiple coaching changes and general attrition. I think the lack of experienced players on the roster, as well as lack of player development under PP/GDL, has really handcuffed Diaco this year (and I am no Diaco apologist!).
Here are the numbers of commitments (not actual # of players that signed and made it to campus) of the AAC schools from 2010, 2011, and 2012:
Memphis 85
Cincinnati 79
Temple 76
Houston 74
SMU 74
Tulsa 70
UCF 69
ECU 66
USF 61
UConn 59
Here are some other schools for comparison: Miami 82, South Carolina 80, Oklahoma St. 78, Syracuse 78, Auburn 77, Miss. St. 76, Tennessee 76, Alabama 75, Clemson 73, FSU 73, Utah 72, Michigan 72, Iowa 71, Oklahoma 71, West Virginia 71, Louisville 70, Oregon 68, UNC 68, Vanderbilt 68, Virginia Tech 68, Baylor 67, Rutgers 67, UCLA 66, TCU 65, Texas A&M 64, Michigan St. 64, ND 63, Pitt 61, BC 61, California 61, Duke 60, Nebraska 59, Georgia Tech 59, Wisconsin 55, Northwestern 55, Wake Forest 54
Using the Rivals database, I looked at the number of commitments to a school by year. There are some issues with the data such as JC transfers and some commits never signed or never showed up. But, the numbers provide some valuable insight.
I focused on the 2010, 2011, and 2012 recruiting years. These would be the RS Seniors, Seniors, RS Juniors, Juniors, and RS Sophomores this year. In other words, what should be the core of your team. The results confirm that UConn had a low number of commitments relative to other schools. In fact, I could only find a couple of FBS schools (although I didn't calculate every one) that had a lower number of commitments during the three years.
When I look at the numbers, it seems UConn did not bring in enough recruits to account for multiple coaching changes and general attrition. I think the lack of experienced players on the roster, as well as lack of player development under PP/GDL, has really handcuffed Diaco this year (and I am no Diaco apologist!).
Here are the numbers of commitments (not actual # of players that signed and made it to campus) of the AAC schools from 2010, 2011, and 2012:
Memphis 85
Cincinnati 79
Temple 76
Houston 74
SMU 74
Tulsa 70
UCF 69
ECU 66
USF 61
UConn 59
Here are some other schools for comparison: Miami 82, South Carolina 80, Oklahoma St. 78, Syracuse 78, Auburn 77, Miss. St. 76, Tennessee 76, Alabama 75, Clemson 73, FSU 73, Utah 72, Michigan 72, Iowa 71, Oklahoma 71, West Virginia 71, Louisville 70, Oregon 68, UNC 68, Vanderbilt 68, Virginia Tech 68, Baylor 67, Rutgers 67, UCLA 66, TCU 65, Texas A&M 64, Michigan St. 64, ND 63, Pitt 61, BC 61, California 61, Duke 60, Nebraska 59, Georgia Tech 59, Wisconsin 55, Northwestern 55, Wake Forest 54