Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: Yanks $2 Bill player salary since 2010
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="storrsroars, post: 3303580, member: 2500"] Point #1 may be true. Point #2 is simply a bad idea. I don't know if I even care how much a management group makes. I do care that they are essentially stewards of something akin to a public trust in their cities. One of the positives about MLB has long been that it's been an affordable ticket to most fans, unlike every other major sport. A floor would increase ticket prices as a starting point while not addressing competitiveness. Point #2 also ignores the current compensation system, which widely available analytics conclusively shows the value of players and is skewed very heavily to those in pre-arb/arb situations who can't test free agency. There are very few post-arb "superstars" worth their salaries. Somehow, that needs to be addressed with either shorter terms of team control or earlier qualification for arbitration or both. Additionally, and this is certainly a sore point for us in Pittsburgh, there needs to be something like an "anti-luxury tax" that would still allow a team to "tank" for a year, but would have some sort of 3-to-5 year rolling average on "competitiveness" that would dictate how much revenue sharing a team gets. That would reward better management. And if an ownership group fails to meet competitiveness standards repeatedly (term tbd), then MLB will step in and take control. Whatever happens in the next CBA, the MLBPA can't be shortsighted in just promoting the interests of its veteran membership, most of whom aren't worth their salaries. Compensation for minor leaguers, draft compensation, and compensation especially players in their first six years needs to be the primary focus. Speaking as a Pirates fan, let's not forget it was a big market team (Red Sox) who forced a change to the draft because a small market team (Pirates) actually did spend significant $$ on the draft, outspending every other team in MLB for several years before the "draft pool" was instituted. See Bell, Josh. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: Yanks $2 Bill player salary since 2010
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom