OT: USA v Jamaica WCQ @ Kingston | The Boneyard

OT: USA v Jamaica WCQ @ Kingston

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jimdish255

Jimdish255

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,885
Reaction Score
18,180
Have just taken the lead 1 - 0 late first half on a cross to Altidore who heads it in.

BeInSport
 
Well that would have been pretty poor if we had dropped those two points, managed to snatch victory from the jaws of a draw that would have felt as bad as defeat. Onward.
 
SO far we have maximum home points and 4 away points. We have the upper hand in qualifying and Jamaica is done. If we win the next two, it would take disaster to not make up.

Now if Mexico can start actually winning some games we would be in a much better position...
 
Good to see Altidore showing up a little more consistently. I have no doubts we will finish top 3 in The Hex, but our back line is horrendous. They seem lost on set pieces and allow too many people to run free in the box. I don't know if it is poor communication, confusion of scheme, or L.O.F.T (lack of fecunditying talent), but without major improvement over the next 12 months we will not advance to the knockout stage of the WC.
 
What is wrong with them on the counter attack? They are fumbling the ball around out there. They can't seem to control it.

I had thoughts that the Jamaican pitch was bad. Could that explain it?
 
.-.
upstater said:
I had thoughts that the Jamaican pitch was bad. Could that explain it?
Expand ...

It was actually pretty good by the standards of their stadium. They just had a huge track meet there this week (where Gatlin beat Bolt), so they had the grass in top shape to begin with for appearances.
 
upstater said:
What is wrong with them on the counter attack? They are fumbling the ball around out there. They can't seem to control it.

I had thoughts that the Jamaican pitch was bad. Could that explain it?
Expand ...


No speed. Some skills but no one outruns anyone.
 
It's less about the speed and more about the first touch and the passing. We don't have the skill sets to counter-attack; plain and simple. If you look at classical counter-attack teams of the past (i.e., Italy or Holland), the ball goes from end-to-end by touching the foot of four different players "one-touch" in about 5 seconds. In other words, it's the ball running faster, not the players running faster.

The US has made a living off of having an extremely fit and fast soccer team for about 2 decades now. It's not the speed. It's the first touch quality. We don't have it (with the exception of perhaps Dempsey)...
 
UConnDan97 said:
It's the first touch quality. We don't have it (with the exception of perhaps Dempsey)...
Expand ...

That's true, but they still have their moments. Altidore's goal was against Germany was the result of two 1st touches.
 
UConnDan97 said:
It's less about the speed and more about the first touch and the passing. We don't have the skill sets to counter-attack; plain and simple. If you look at classical counter-attack teams of the past (i.e., Italy or Holland), the ball goes from end-to-end by touching the foot of four different players "one-touch" in about 5 seconds. In other words, it's the ball running faster, not the players running faster.

The US has made a living off of having an extremely fit and fast soccer team for about 2 decades now. It's not the speed. It's the first touch quality. We don't have it (with the exception of perhaps Dempsey)...
Expand ...


This^^^^. Though it has improved greatly over the years, we still have a few club foots on the first team. In 90, 94, and 98 there was no more than one or two guys who had an international level first touch.

Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
 
.-.
I wish I could have seen this game. I have no idea what channel "BeInSport" is. Anyone going to the Costa Rica Gold Cup game at the Rent?
 
Waquoit said:
That's true, but they still have their moments. Altidore's goal was against Germany was the result of two 1st touches.
Expand ...

And I wouldn't classify the Altidore goal as a "counter-attack" either. A nice build up, a beautiful cross from Zusi in the corner, and a very fine volley finish from Altidore. But not a counter...

EDIT: I'll call it a pseudo-counter, because they covered a lot of ground in a short period of time, but the Germans outnumbered us in the box 6-2. Still, it was a classy goal! :cool:

 
UConnDan97 said:
And I wouldn't classify the Altidore goal as a "counter-attack" either. A nice build up, a beautiful cross from Zusi in the corner, and a very fine volley finish from Altidore. But not a counter...

EDIT: I'll call it a pseudo-counter, because they covered a lot of ground in a short period of time, but the Germans outnumbered us in the box 6-2. Still, it was a classy goal! :cool:
Expand ...

A pseudo-counter? Suck it up and call it what it was: a counter-attack. Only 4 in the box when the ball was played in and no one was marking Altidore. This video shows that attack from the beginning. Start at the 1:50 mark.
 
Waquoit said:
A pseudo-counter? Suck it up and call it what it was: a counter-attack.
Expand ...

You can't call it a counter attack when the opposing team has three times as many defenders in the box as you have attackers. It means they clearly weren't on the attack for you to "counter-attack" against, right? I was just trying to give you props for pointing out that the US squad showed first-touch quality there. And I'm still willing to give you props for that. And I really like the way that Zusi is developing....I think he is the right winger of the future for this team...
 
UConnDan97 said:
You can't call it a counter attack when the opposing team has three times as many defenders in the box as you have attackers.
Expand ...

Oh, BS. Three of the guys in the box weren't anywhere near Altidore, two were barely in the box at all. Altidore wasn't even marked, because the one guy near him was back on his heels.

Germany was advancing when USA intercepted a pass and immediately advanced the ball - 2-touch, 2-touch, 1-touch, carry and pass, 1-touch, 1-touch, Goal! The defense wasn't close to being set. That's a counter-attack in any country or league in the world.
 
.-.
Waquoit said:
Oh, BS. Three of the guys in the box weren't anywhere near Altidore, two were barely in the box at all. Altidore wasn't even marked, because the one guy near him was back on his heels.

Germany was advancing when USA intercepted a pass and immediately advanced the ball - 2-touch, 2-touch, 1-touch, carry and pass, 1-touch, 1-touch, Goal! The defense wasn't close to being set. That's a counter-attack in any country or league in the world.
Expand ...

Your statement contradicted your point.

Yes, I agree; Germany did a horrible job marking Altidore, as three of the guys were nowhere near him. There were five defenders in the box without argument and we can argue the sixth. I also agree with your assessment of "2-touch, 2-touch, 1-touch, carry and pass, 1-touch, 1-touch, Goal!" Also, by definition, not a counter-attack. That's just an attack. We were unarguably outnumbered two to one in the box during the attack. That's just not a counter. But it's a really really nice goal, so it's okay...
 
I am more encouraged than I have been with ball movement. We are not Spain, but the ball is beginning to flow much better. Altidore finding space. Zusi is probably their best player right now and will be missed against Honduras. Germany mailed the game in I thought, but Jamaica HAD to win to stay alive. We still managed find space.

The Jamaican goal, as best I could see on the 3 x 5 card live streaming, was offsides. The guy camped behind the wall and I am sure that every defense-man was waiting for a flag to go up. But Howard should have come out on that. Bad play on his part.

Looking forward to Honduras on Tuesday. I am mad that I will be on vacation for Costa Rica.
 
UConnDan97 said:
Also, by definition, not a counter-attack. That's just an attack. We were unarguably outnumbered two to one in the box during the attack.
Expand ...

Everyone was running one way and in an instant everyone was running the other way. It was 1 v 1 right in front of the goal. 1 v 0 actually. I admit you know more soccer than I do, but you're wrong here. Admit it and move on. Or are you of those guys that makes it a point to condescendingly say "pitch" whenever someone says "field" or "keeper" whenever they say "goalie"?
 
Dooley said:
I wish I could have seen this game. I have no idea what channel "BeInSport" is. Anyone going to the Costa Rica Gold Cup game at the Rent?
Expand ...


Will be at the game with 4-6.
 
Zusi a guy with good skills but no flat out speed. Got to have him out there but having someone to get the ball to with pace would help him. Back in the days of Cobi Jones we'd just send it down and hope for someone to run on or force a turnover. We've come far from that for the better. But without Donovan we seem to lack pace. Actually we lose more than just that but we do need some more pace to open things up further for Dempsey, Altidore and Zusi. Another option for Bradley to pass to who can also pressure the ball. Just one observation but point well taken on the inconsistency of quick accurate passing. I have been a huge fan of Spanish football for decades for just that reason.
 
Waquoit said:
Everyone was running one way and in an instant everyone was running the other way. It was 1 v 1 right in front of the goal. 1 v 0 actually. I admit you know more soccer than I do, but you're wrong here. Admit it and move on. Or are you of those guys that makes it a point to condescendingly say "pitch" whenever someone says "field" or "keeper" whenever they say "goalie"?
Expand ...


Dude, if you believe that it was a 1 vs. 1 or a "1 v 0 actually", then there is no point to arguing further. Both your video and mine show that the US was outnumbered in the box and that it was a matter of extremely poor marking, not a matter of the Germans getting caught out on an attack (hence the words "counter-attack").

It was a great goal. It was a great result. But just call it what it was....or don't, it doesn't matter. I'm just letting you know what it wasn't...
 
.-.
Enough with that goal against Germany. Howabout that game against Panama last night? Thats the best I've seen them play in a long time. Easily could have been 3 or 4 nil.
 
Mots010 said:
Enough with that goal against Germany. Howabout that game against Panama last night? Thats the best I've seen them play in a long time. Easily could have been 3 or 4 nil.
Expand ...

Sadly, it was past my bedtime. Very happy to see the result. The travel and the field condition was a bit of a concern to me going in.

Anymore goals on the counter-attack last night?
 
Waquoit said:
Sadly, it was past my bedtime. Very happy to see the result. The travel and the field condition was a bit of a concern to me going in.

Anymore goals on the counter-attack last night?
Expand ...

The first one was a nice counter! Beautiful pass from Fabian Johnson to Jozy Altidore. Jozy continues to tear it up. I have to say that the US team looked better last night than it has ever looked, IMHO. The passing was crisp and, to borrow a term from Ian Darke, inventive. Nice one- and two-touch soccer. If they play like that against Honduras, we are going to Brazil...
 
And the crowd... Sounders fans trading in the rave green for Red White and Blue. We've seen big crowds in different cities but the supporter culture in Seattle really comes through. I wonder if we should have had the Mexico game in Seattle...
 
junglehusky said:
And the crowd... Sounders fans trading in the rave green for Red White and Blue. We've seen big crowds in different cities but the supporter culture in Seattle really comes through. I wonder if we should have had the Mexico game in Seattle...
Expand ...

The Seattle crowd is arguably the greatest soccer crowd in the US, and it would be a travesty not to include them every year into the national team schedule...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,357
Messages
4,567,038
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom