Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: UNC response to NCAA's 3rd notice of allegations
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Earls & Kings, post: 2212436, member: 7364"] I went searching the NCA website for the maximum NCAA punishment for use of ineligible players. All I've found is the minimum punishment of forfeiting all games in which ineligible players were used. I believe I stumbled onto what appears to be the basis of the UNC issues....copied below. If I read it correctly, even if academics is the purview of the accrediting body, all instances involving the participation of a staff member must be reported to the NCAA. So the NCAA does have jurisdiction... this is not a get out of jail free card. I also found a handful of instances where the NCAA meted out the Death Penalty, banning teams from playing a sport for one year. Again, I couldn't find an upper limit for punishment. [SIZE=5][B]"Council clarifies academic misconduct rules [/B][/SIZE] April 15, 2014 4:39pmMichelle Brutlag Hosick The Division I Legislative Council reinforced Tuesday the membership’s belief that academic standards and policies governing misconduct are the responsibility of individual schools and their accreditation body at a meeting in Indianapolis. The Council approved an interpretation that clarifies the membership’s position that it is a school’s responsibility to decide whether or not misconduct involving current or future student-athletes or school staff has occurred and, if it has, to make sure the case is handled according to policies applicable to all students. “This clarification of the current rules is a first step toward a broader membership discussion of academic misconduct that will occur in the new governance structure,” said Kevin Lennon, vice president of academic and membership affairs. The Legislative Council also confirmed that schools that determine academic misconduct has occurred must report it to the NCAA when: [LIST] [*]a staff member is involved in arranging for false credit or transcripts for a student-athlete or future student-athlete; [*]a student-athlete or prospect is involved in arranging for false credit or transcripts; or [*]a student-athlete competes while ineligible as the result of academic misconduct. [/LIST] Other academic offenses by student-athletes (cheating on a test, plagiarizing on a paper) do not need to be reported if the cheating doesn’t result in a student-athlete getting a grade he or she didn’t earn that makes him or her fraudulently eligible to compete. However, all cases must follow the same academic policies the school has for all its students." [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,658
Messages
4,405,413
Members
10,221
Latest member
abbbb
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
OT: UNC response to NCAA's 3rd notice of allegations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom