Blakeon18
Dormie
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 4,157
- Reaction Score
- 13,490
I saw a mention over the weekend that Oscar Pistorius....the South African who competed in London with 2 prostheses....was beaten by Alan Oliveira in the 200 meters in the Paralympic games.
Alan is also a double amputee. Right after the race Oscar complained that Alan's blades were too long
and that he should not have been allowed to wear them. The official committee said they were fine.
Today in USAToday Oscar apologized. Not for the content of his protest but for the timing of it....right after being beaten. Apparently he thinks he should have cooled off some and then said the same thing.
Question: If he had won the race, would he have made the same complaint?
Question: if Alan had qualified for the London games, would Oscar have been opposed to his running
based on this same issue...i.e. Alan would have an unfair advantage?
Oscar's entrance in the Games in August was inspirational in lots of ways. This recent brouhaha....initial comment and then the 'apology'...takes a bit of the shine off his achievements...imo.
Alan is also a double amputee. Right after the race Oscar complained that Alan's blades were too long
and that he should not have been allowed to wear them. The official committee said they were fine.
Today in USAToday Oscar apologized. Not for the content of his protest but for the timing of it....right after being beaten. Apparently he thinks he should have cooled off some and then said the same thing.
Question: If he had won the race, would he have made the same complaint?
Question: if Alan had qualified for the London games, would Oscar have been opposed to his running
based on this same issue...i.e. Alan would have an unfair advantage?
Oscar's entrance in the Games in August was inspirational in lots of ways. This recent brouhaha....initial comment and then the 'apology'...takes a bit of the shine off his achievements...imo.