- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction Score
- 68,071
I don't watch Vanity Fair hence cannot judge.Sure doesn't look like any airbrushing in any of those?
And how about that SI cover of DT?
But, what wrong with DT in SI?
I don't watch Vanity Fair hence cannot judge.Sure doesn't look like any airbrushing in any of those?
And how about that SI cover of DT?
I don't watch Vanity Fair hence cannot judge.
But, what wrong with DT in SI?
I don't watch Vanity Fair hence cannot judge.
But, what wrong with DT in SI?
I don't think they would be exploiting her death, but celebrating the courage she displayed while she was alive. As far as making profits, that is what business' do.How is that any different from using the memory of a deceased young lady "for its own profit making motives"?
Not interested in Vanity Fair at all, thanks.Vanity Fair is a magazine. You don't even have to read the magazine because I linked to a page full of them. Here's that link again.
I've been ambivalent about this whole "Caitlyn Jenner" issue since it has been such a media event. My mind was changed somewhat last night after discussing her with a group of older mothers volunteering at a high school event. It was refreshing how open minded and kind they were. If this issue leads to more compassion to people than I applaud Caitlyn Jenner despite the media frenzy.
I don't think they would be exploiting her death, but celebrating the courage she displayed while she was alive. As far as making profits, that is what business' do.
Were they in favor of giving the Arthur Ashe Courage award to Caitlyn over Lauren Hill? That is the real topic here although it seems to have been hijacked.
ESPN has never mentioned who was considered. This is a pseudo-fact issue you invented in your mind. If you can source the list of people who ESPN considered I will stand corrected.
Somehow I don't think Arthur Ashe would approve.