ctchamps
We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 17,788
- Reaction Score
- 45,792
It's less about defending tailgating and more about you using the tailgating argument as a defense for not needing to remove snow off your car's roof if it has less than three inches of snow. People should be doing both things for safe driving. And the distance between cars should be adjusted depending on driving conditions.If you can not come to a complete stop if the car in front of you stops short, you are tailgating. BOTH of the links in Post #173 refer to 3-4 seconds behind in good conditions, more in the winter. What have I said repeatedly throughout this thread?
So how was tailgating not a factor in that video? I stop watched it 5 times. The ice was in the air for less than 2 seconds. So obviously, if something, anything comes off the car in front of you and you hit it in less that 2 seconds, you were following two close. If that front car hit a rock and stopped short, the car behind it would have crashed into it. That is the definition of traveling too close. If the second car was more than 3 seconds back, the ice would have smashed harmlessly on the road.
Why do you people insist on defending tailgating? Find me a website on safe driving that recommends following less than 2 seconds behind the car in front of you in the winter.
You still have not admitted you are wrong in the five percent of times you don't have your car in the garage and snow is on the roof.
The way you approached this thread is to not back down on your failure. Yet you get angry when people persist on making claims how the BE stinks. You insist they change. But can't do so yourself when you're so obviously in the wrong.