- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,421
- Reaction Score
- 12,872
Saw this on the football board - apparently Oklahoma State was able to avoid APR penalty because a player from the '90s just graduated.
Seems fair.
Seems fair.
I don't even see how that's possible. An APR score from the 1998 football team has long since been irrelevant. Heck, they didn't calculate APR scores back then.
Something had to be lost in translation between the source and the writer.
You could make a really convincing argument that we never win the 2014 title without the APR ban of 2013. Even though none of us would change anything, it is still a problem. We have the stigma of a school that doesn't care about academics. Maybe we don't, but there's no reason to think we care any less than any other top sports school.Trying to put this APR stuff in the rearview mirror but every time this comes up it piss' s me off. We were not treated fairly but man winning the. Championship last year sure made up for all the crap the Ncaa and that goofy ass Emert thru at us . What a payback we exacted and seeing the look on his face when he handed the trophy To KO was awesome. This is what happens when you ban us will always be priceless.
You could make a really convincing argument that we never win the 2014 title without the APR ban of 2013. Even though none of us would change anything, it is still a problem. We have the stigma of a school that doesn't care about academics. Maybe we don't, but there's no reason to think we care any less than any other top sports school.
Shorter version -- the NCAA is always terrible.
I still believe we should have sued the NCAA the way they retroactively punished us. But at this point it's water under the bridge. We already got justice on the NCAA by winning the Championship, and then Shabazz's ballsy comments right to that coward Emmert's face.