- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,044
- Reaction Score
- 1,870
Here's a couple sentences from the NYT writeup that just don't make no sense (to me anyway):
One game over .500 lifetime = perennial contender and formidable to replace? I know he brought Rutgers back from the grave, but they were not perennial contenders, unless you redefine "perennial" to mean "for a few weeks once in 2006".
i think you could say just about anyone but Syracuse has been a perennial BE contender for the last 4-5 years.