My point is that message board postings are in the same category as casual conversation. Correcting someone's grammar in either instance can come across as obnoxious snobbery.I'm not sure if I fit into that category, but I probably do. Generally, no--that would be obnoxious. When my kids were growing up, I tried to teach them proper grammar. With other folks, I probably noticed it, but let it slide.
Grammer knotzies our a bunch of loosers.Neither Kibs nor I are "obsessed" with grammar. It is just that we sometimes feel the need to defend the besieged ramparts of correct usage against those who persist in using "lead" for "led", "coupe" for "coup", "route" for "rout", "rein" for "reign" and other such linguistic shocks. Someone has to. Or so I think. And neither do we jump on every offense. It is just that there are some examples of poor usage up with which we simply cannot put.![]()
Yea, pretty much figured that.Research from Michigan indicates that overly-critical grammarians aren't necessarily the nicest people in the world.
I largely agree. Whether someone is understood is the important part. Proper grammar facilitates that, but small flaws are usually immaterial. I hesitate to correct unless someone else does it first. Among other things, I know I'm not perfect (my typing is much worse than my grammar or spelling).My point is that message board postings are in the same category as casual conversation. Correcting someone's grammar in either instance can come across as obnoxious snobbery.
The only thing that should matter in a mb post is comprehension - not fodder for some elitist snickering about a misplaced comma.
Most of the time you will loose unless you are the dominate team.
Lets go eat grandma
Lets go eat,grandma
Tiny,tiny,tiny little comma and grandma is saved.
My wife must be the exception--she was college professor --specialty in English grandmer. Obviously, I didn't take her course. But it is an amazing business/professional asset to have someone you can rely on to provide proof reading of communications etc.Truth in advertising - I think correct grammar and word usage is important. In college I had a graduate assistantship in the school's writing lab. And when I find an error (typo, spelling, etc.) in my postings here, I really do cringe.
Research from Michigan indicates that overly-critical grammarians aren't necessarily the nicest people in the world.
I'm not trying to take a poke at anyone - it's just that since the topic of grammar shows up now and then on this board, I found the fact that someone did research on this a bit amusing.
Hear's the link two the story if your interested.
People obsessed with grammar aren't as nice as everybody else, study suggests
A question for the compulsive grammarians. Do you also correct people in normal conversation?
I might be weird, but I'd like to see a comma after "tough."
I guess it would disrupt the stream--and the point.You're right: I think it actually needs that comma, Gus. Just it wouldn't look as nice.
A question for the compulsive grammarians. Do you also correct people in normal conversation?