Husky25
Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Messages
- 18,714
- Reaction Score
- 19,815
I completely disagree with everything except for the last line.I agree the numbers look paltry compared to recent shortstops and what you would expect to be HOF numbers. I think you have to take into account the era he played in and what was expected of shortstops and compare him to shortstops that played against him and then compare league avg to other eras. I used to have a great software program that did that but not anymore unfortunately. Also he finished in the top 20 of mvp voting seven times (and won one). HOF Rabbit Maranville had worse numbers than Rizzuto but for his time he was considered a great shortstop finishing in the top 17 in MVP voting eight times.
Supposedly Ted Williams made this comment about Rizzuto in 49. He was on first base and pointing at Rizzuto he told Tommy Henrich that 'if we had that little squirt we'd be out in front by 10 games right now.'
Boston's SS was Junior Stephens who had much better stats then Rizzuto.
Forgot to add.....I didn't think he deserved the HOF .....but I didn't see him play either.
According to Rizzuto's baseball-reference page, comparable players include Jose Offerman and 9 other guys (from his era and prior) who no one has ever heard of and who are not in the Hall of Fame. His Hall of Fame Statistics are also well below even the marginal HoF thresholds. Winning an MVP in that era doesn't do much for me. There were only 8 teams so the pool was kind of shallow. Roger Maris has 2 MVPs and he's not a HoFer. Bringing up other players that may or may not be HoF worthy (i.e. Rabbit Maranville) does nothing to further Rizzuto's cause.
Look, it is what it is and it's not like he going to be kicked out (though that would be a great tweak. Only a set number of players may be in the HoF at any given time. If you want to add one, another must be dropped), but it doesn't mean he should have been considered in the first place.