- Joined
- Jan 30, 2015
- Messages
- 4,271
- Reaction Score
- 35,397
Projected 14th and finished 11th. Beat Notre Dame, FSU and UNC.
Not sure what this says about the ACC
Can you improve like that as a coach because he was honestly dreadful at Memphis, almost clueless.
Not sure what this says about the ACC
Can you improve like that as a coach because he was honestly dreadful at Memphis, almost clueless.
After reading your topic heading "AAC" coach of year (clearly a typo) I thought our conference was so bad this year they gave the award to the guy who left.
Pastner reminds me a little bit of Bob Diaco.
You mean in terms of his rah-rah?
Certainly not in terms of the results.
Not a fan of Pastner at all, but I'm not sure that's a fair comparison.Yes, thats exactly what i meant.
Not a fan of Pastner at all, but I'm not sure that's a fair comparison.
Pastner is absurdly upbeat, but I think he's just a naively positive guy. I don't think he's completely divorced from reality like crazy Bob, though.
Honestly? depends on the teams Uconn would have to play twice. But probably 5-13. Uconn would beat BC twice, maybe NC State once, Pitt once, another close loss for Clemson (at least one win). Maybe they could get to 6 by playing some of those teams a second time or beating gtech, which could happen. No better than 6-12 IMHO.The ACC is terrible. Anybody care to hazard a guess at what our conference record would be in that league?
Honestly? depends on the teams Uconn would have to play twice. But probably 5-13. Uconn would beat BC twice, maybe NC State once, Pitt once, another close loss for Clemson (at least one win). Maybe they could get to 6 by playing some of those teams a second time or beating gtech, which could happen. No better than 6-12 IMHO.
If they get to play the bottom 4 or 5 teams plus cuse twice, yah, 7'-11 max but I think it could be as bad as 5-13 if the schedule is top heavy. They would likely play cuse, bc and duke twice most years probably vtech and pitt too (one can dream of the acc one day). They beat cuse at least once and BC twice, that much if for sure. Outside that, who knows...but tally a few more wins just the same.
Clearly it was the addition of Pastner that put the conference over the edge
LMAO!After reading your topic heading "AAC" coach of year (clearly a typo) I thought our conference was so bad this year they gave the award to the guy who left.