Under the circumstances we are in it makes sense. He was a good recruiter and he had passion. He didn't get along with the Athletic Director at the times and the AD was fires shortly after Edsall departure giving notion that he was right all along. Plus he knows how to win.
I thought he did pretty poorly at Maryland, but the opposite was true. He inherited a team that was a mess and went 2-10 the first season. 4-8 the next, 7-6 the next (lost their bowl game to Marshall) and 7-6 the following year losing their bowl game to Stanford.
Pretty decent improvement in a conference much tougher than the American. I also like that he was not afraid to fire offensive and defensive coordinators while there. Too often it seems that UCONN's offense has been HORRIBLE and the HC refuses to do anything different, including firing the offensive coordinators.
At the time I thought Diaco was a good hire. In hindsight, he was awful. Between PP and BD, the UCONN football program was run into the ground. Hopefully Edsell has learned from his time at Maryland and Detroit and is poised for an even better run at UCONN. Not like we have a choice, but I'm certainly willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
There are hundreds of D1 assistants or small college coaches that would have been a better choice. The notion you can go back to the future is absurd.
Not sure I agree with this. Diaco came from Notre Dame - a blue blood football program if there ever was one. I sort of thought Moorehead would have been a nice choice but maybe he was not available.