OT: Men's Side: Is it just me? | The Boneyard

OT: Men's Side: Is it just me?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bruinbball

@biglurp
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
1,407
Reaction Score
1,320
I do not like that the team who won their conference tourney have to have a play-in game to make the actual tourney. If anything, make the final 8 in play in the play-in games. Let the little teams that won their conference tourneys play a real game in the tourney - they earned it.
 
I do not like that the team who won their conference tourney have to have a play-in game to make the actual tourney. If anything, make the final 8 in play in the play-in games. Let the little teams that won their conference tourneys play a real game in the tourney - they earned it.
I would agree.
 
I do not like that the team who won their conference tourney have to have a play-in game to make the actual tourney. If anything, make the final 8 in play in the play-in games. Let the little teams that won their conference tourneys play a real game in the tourney - they earned it.

The NCAA doesn't consider it a play-in game though.. Technically, it's the first round now.
 
If everyone had to play 7 games to win it all I would agree, but we all know the truth.
 
If everyone had to play 7 games to win it all I would agree, but we all know the truth.
You want 128 teams?

We all know those playin teams are not gonna be playing more than a couple games anyway.
 
You want 128 teams?

We all know those playin teams are not gonna be playing more than a couple games anyway.

For the most part, unless they're VCU and go on a run that almost takes them to the NC game after 5 wins. You never know.
 
You want 128 teams?

We all know those playin teams are not gonna be playing more than a couple games anyway.
No, not at all. I thought 64 was a good number. I'd rather see small conference teams who earned their way in by winning the conference championship play in the real tourney as opposed to the middle of the pack BCS schools who was sub .500 in conference play. If they want in, make them play for it. Don't penalize the little guy.

And more importantly, it screws up brackets :0)
 
You want 128 teams?

We all know those playin teams are not gonna be playing more than a couple games anyway.
256 teams with a play in game for the remaining 60 or so. I only takes 8 games, plus the play ins.
 
I do not like that the team who won their conference tourney have to have a play-in game to make the actual tourney. If anything, make the final 8 in play in the play-in games. Let the little teams that won their conference tourneys play a real game in the tourney - they earned it.
And actually only 4 of the play-in teams are tournament winners, and one of those has a losing record. Iona, BYU, South Florida, and Cal are all at-larges, the 4 lowest rated of the at-large teams.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
33
Guests online
1,290
Total visitors
1,323

Forum statistics

Threads
164,003
Messages
4,378,173
Members
10,170
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom