OT: Massive payments to ex-officials trigger IRS audit of U of L Foundation | Page 2 | The Boneyard

OT: Massive payments to ex-officials trigger IRS audit of U of L Foundation

Joined
Aug 5, 2017
Messages
3,590
Reaction Score
9,190
Serious question: Do you want the NCAA deciding what course content is acceptable? Because that is what you are asking for in the UNC case. As they say. Bad cases make bad law.

It doesn't require the NCAA to decide on what course content is acceptable. The school admitted there were no classes, no exams, "papers" being graded by administrative people, and thus the courses didn't exist.
What I always asked for in the UNC case is that the players grades for the phony classes be exempted from their records.
If they would still be eligible, then don't penalize them.
If some players would then be ineligible for failure to maintain the required GPA or because they didn't have the required minimum credits then the games in which they played should be forfeited.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,184
Reaction Score
8,761
It doesn't require the NCAA to decide on what course content is acceptable. The school admitted there were no classes, no exams, "papers" being graded by administrative people, and thus the courses didn't exist.
What I always asked for in the UNC case is that the players grades for the phony classes be exempted from their records.
If they would still be eligible, then don't penalize them.
If some players would then be ineligible for failure to maintain the required GPA or because they didn't have the required minimum credits then the games in which they played should be forfeited.

While the classes in question may have been 'open' to the entire university (UNC has roughly 18,500 undergraduates), its almost statistically impossible for the classes to be taken by 50% of the football team (85 scholarship players) and nearly the entire basketball team (13 scholarship players) without proactive steering by someone in the university.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,870
Reaction Score
33,015
Serious question: Do you want the NCAA deciding what course content is acceptable? Because that is what you are asking for in the UNC case. As they say. Bad cases make bad law.
Real courses vs. fake courses. Easy decision.
 

intlzncster

i fart in your general direction
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
28,931
Reaction Score
60,234
While the classes in question may have been 'open' to the entire university (UNC has roughly 18,500 undergraduates), its almost statistically impossible for the classes to be taken by 50% of the football team (85 scholarship players) and nearly the entire basketball team (13 scholarship players) without proactive steering by someone in the university.

Iirc it's well documented (via phone/txt/email records) that the kids were steered towards them.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
7,184
Reaction Score
8,761
Iirc it's well documented (via phone/txt/email records) that the kids were steered towards them.

Which is the defense that UNC used and the NCAA swallowed. Meanwhile, UConn flunks its kids taking classes (like many college student tend to do), and wham-o. And there there was Syracuse, Penn St, Louisville (3 or 4 times), U Miami, and now Michigan St. For a 2 year period, the NCAA was out to sink UConn and the found a 'crime' to fit their narrative.
 

Online statistics

Members online
325
Guests online
2,045
Total visitors
2,370

Forum statistics

Threads
158,918
Messages
4,173,562
Members
10,043
Latest member
coolbeans44


.
Top Bottom