Really? This guy was tossing up 30 and 20 every other week on the T-Wolves! I don't think I can name anyone other than Rubio on the last 3 Wolves rosters. He's hungry to win. Lebron is chiseled and determined. The burden is off Irving to be the alpha dog and I think he'll really shine. I don't see how this is a bad move.
So is your opinion that Cleveland got a bargain? Or was it a completely even-trade?
My view is influenced by the comps - like any transaction. The comps say you don't get much back when a superstar demands a trade and therefore the Cavs paid over market. Here are superstars and what their teams got in return in recent past, most were in last year or similar contract situation (trade demand) to Love:
2012 Dwight Howard - Orlando got Al Harrington, Aaron Affalo, Nikola Vucevic (?), Josh McRoberts and a bunch of scrubs + 3 x 1st rounders and a 2nd rounder
2012 Harden - (Daquean Cook, Cole Aldrich & Lazar Hayward? included with him) OKC got 1yr of Kevin Martin & Lamb + 2 x 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick
2011 Carmelo & Chauncey Billups - Denver got Ray Felton, Danilo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler, Timofy Mosgov, 1 x 1st rounder, 2 x 2nd round
2011 Chris Paul - Hornets got Eric Gordon, Chris Kaman, Al-Farouq Aminu and 1st rounder
So in the four very recent trades; Howard, Harden, Carmelo and Chris Paul had the receiving team give up far less than Cleveland IF we assume Wiggins as #1 pick is an all-star or better. If Wiggins becomes a franchise type player and Bennett a starter, Minnesota becomes a huge outlier that got equal or better value for a top-10-ish player. Trade may be equal swap of players today and even in long-term, but Cavs paid above market because LeBron (I don't blame him) forced their hand.