Sorry for jumping into this thread so late, but I have to chime in. Chin Diesel, I think you're doing your candidates and your company a disservice by not taking a couple of minutes to read through a resume completely. Just because somebody doesn't grab your attention in the first ten seconds doesn't mean they aren't very qualified for the position...or at least should get an opportunity at an interview.
I think Whaler11 had it right earlier when he said he reads through all resumes to look for those who are qualified and then interviews all of the candidates. Personally, I don't think there is such a thing as wasted effort when you are looking to hire the best candidate for a position.
I also think that resume analyzing software is a waste. In our efforts to make things easier on ourselves, we opted to use a computer to analyze job applicants based on individual keywords. And if there aren't enough "right" keywords in the resume, in the trash bin they go. How many good, qualified candidates never get to speak to a real, live person because of that? And how many very qualified candidates are lost by companies because nobody got to interview the candidate, or never even knew the candidate existed because a computer dumped them?