Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Mazhude, post: 4692983, member: 2960"] [URL='https://theathletic.com/4670429/2023/07/12/conference-realignment-big-ten-jim-delany/']How conference realignment shaped college sports, in ex-Big Ten boss Jim Delany’s words[/URL] "[B]Penn State sought admission into the Big East. Six of the eight Big East members had to vote yes on Penn State. Basketball-only schools Georgetown, St. John’s and Villanova voted no, which kept Penn State out. Its ripple effect was profound when Penn State was accepted as a Big Ten member in 1990. Delany:[/B] If Penn State is with Pittsburgh, Syracuse, Boston College … the East Coast is stabilized, and the Big Ten doesn’t have many places to move. So you have a more formidable, a more stable Big East. But in my view, that inability to see that future and the importance of football made the Big East very vulnerable. Notre Dame doesn’t ever move. [URL='https://theathletic.com/college-football/team/florida-state-seminoles-college-football/']Florida State[/URL] doesn’t move in my view if Penn State doesn’t move. The SEC was already good with their little move ([URL='https://theathletic.com/college-football/team/arkansas-razorbacks-college-football/']Arkansas[/URL] and South Carolina). And Florida State is not going to be pursued by the ACC. I’m saying none of that happens if the Big East expands properly to eight football schools and 12 basketball schools. But their rationale was, that’s too many schools. Eight and 12... It would have changed history probably in the sense that if the East were consolidated with football, and you had Syracuse, Boston College, Rutgers, Pittsburgh, Penn State, maybe West Virginia, and they had full basketball schools, the Big East publics, plus the Catholics plus Penn State and few others, arguably there would have been no vacuum there..." [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach