ConnHuskBask
Shut Em Down!
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 9,059
- Reaction Score
- 33,424
I stand by this.
Trading obj is inexcusable.
I stand by this.
Trading obj is inexcusable.
im good with the concept but what the hell is the plan
I don’t know what we are doing at all. Guess it’s going to be Sweat with the sixth pick and Stidham with the 17th.
There is one thing that concerns me about OBJ, I thought he looked slower last year and so I don’t think he is going to be as productive going forward. His best years are already behind him, but next two years at a lower level for OBJ is still better than 90% of the WR.
I’m here, too.im good with the concept but what the hell is the plan
Trading obj is inexcusable.
I don't even like OBJ, but getting a first and Peppers..huh??
$5 million net. NY on the hook for $16 million next season.And a third. Plus $17m in cap space. Honestly, that haul is better than I thought.
But I wouldn't have traded him anyway.
they should have traded obj a long time ago. its the complete lack of a coherent plan that is frightening.
they should have traded obj a long time ago. its the complete lack of a coherent plan that is frightening.
$5 million net. NY on the hook for $16 million next season.
Holy @#$%balls. That's insane.
@KembaStepback that's more than I reckoned it would be. Peppers really came on last year when he switched to playing in the box. Guess this was their Collins replacement.
The Browns are swinging for the fences. I'm not really sure what to think.
I don't know if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me.
Like I said before, it’s just odd that NY took what they took when you figured this wasn’t at all like Pittsburgh having no leverage with AB. I imagine most of us would have thrown the phone across the room if we heard the Browns offer us a 17, a 90- or 80-something, and a young safety for a top 10 skill position player.That. If they were going to move him, do it before you dump a billion bucks into him, thereby lowering his trade value.
Yikes, I didn't even look into the details. But year after they're good no?
Regardless, I agree with Whaler above.
I'm not sure. Timing of the move wasn't the best.
I don't understand why they would trade their best player all while still be on the cap hook for most of his deal this upcoming season..
I roughly recall there being some scuttlebutt when he signed the contract, about it being a 'trade friendly' type of detail, so it sparked a bunch of rumors. I could be wrong there though.
The reports look like the Giants are going to be on the hook for about $21M in dead money.
This was a deal they signed literally this summer.
Yes, I know. Let me see if I can find what I was talking about.
EDIT: ok, not from back then, but here's a sentiment:
Odell Beckham traded from Giants to Browns: Winners and losers | Will Eli Manning’s struggles get worse? Jabrill Peppers fresh start?
WINNER: GM Dave GettlemanThe Giants smartly negotiated Beckham’s five-year, $90 million contract extension so the dead cap hit on a trade is “only” $16 million, compared to $35.5 million if released. It tells you they were wary of the commitment then and there, even though Gettleman’s refrain had been, “We didn’t sign him to trade him.”
For a lot of guys, football is a way to cope with pre-existing social problems. I mean, it's literally a sport that normalizes violence and all sorts of other things that would be considered anti-social in most environments. The nature of the sport plus the comradery allows them to feel socially adjusted.
Odell's a little different. His social problems - quirks, if you want to call them that - directly threaten the culture of any football locker-room. Too early for me to say whether it will work in Cleveland but he's probably not the guy you want around a rebuilding team.
Too early for me to say whether it will work in Cleveland but he's probably not the guy you want around a rebuilding team.