- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Messages
- 8,664
- Reaction Score
- 28,917
As the title says, Thornton has committed to Duke as well as reclassified to the '15 class. Huge get for them.
- Jeter is soft as hell. He's overrated and Okafor will be sorely missed.God d*** this is exactly what I was afraid of.
At his age and this stage of his career, I believe he doesn't give a . History will be kind to him and he knows that.K is back to selling his soul
It doesnt even matter though, they get a boost just for being Duke. Just look at the tournament seeding this year, it was laughable. Duke finished SECOND in their own conference behind Virginia, yet was ranked ahead of them all regular season and got the #1 seed in the tournament over UVa without winning either the regular season or their tournament. I know they had a great strength of schedule but come on, Duke gets points just for being Duke.- Jeter is soft as hell. He's overrated and Okafor will be sorely missed.
- A reclassified Thornton won't be as good as Tyus Jones was this past year
- I like Ingram and Kennard, but I don't think they can make up for the production lost, even with Allen improving and Obi eligible.
Duke will be good, but I don't think they'll be a NC threat.
I actually read an article somewhere that an anonymous employee in the Duke athletic apartment let slip to someone that every athletic team at Duke is given 1 "no questions asked, look the other way" scholarship in which academic requirements are completely disregarded. Its really no mystery, everyone and their mother knows 95% of ALL athletes at Duke could never sniff an acceptance letter their if they werent good with a ball.There will be more going to Duke. But wait, won't all those academic purist at Duke speak up about a system that is making a mockery of the concept of student/athlete. Nah.
It doesnt even matter though, they get a boost just for being Duke. Just look at the tournament seeding this year, it was laughable. Duke finished SECOND in their own conference behind Virginia, yet was ranked ahead of them all regular season and got the #1 seed in the tournament over UVa without winning either the regular season or their tournament. I know they had a great strength of schedule but come on, Duke gets points just for being Duke.
Now with Duke basically reloading with NBA talent every year, and arguably the greatest X and O's coach ever building them up, they will be an even stronger force.
So your saying hes Top 5, or in other words, "arguably" the best, as in he has a case if there were to be a debate.
K is a legendary program-builder and recruiter who couldn't solve a big-to-big double with a title on the line, and has lost a ton of first-weekend games over the last decade. He's a very good Xs & Os guy (and proved it once and for all with this year's team), but he's not Rick Pitino, Bob Knight or Jim Calhoun.
No. I'm saying he's not close to the best Xs and Os guys - not close to the top 5. I'd love to see what a guy like Phil Martelli or Gregg Marshall could do with the talent K gets, for example.So your saying hes Top 5, or in other words, "arguably" the best, as in he has a case if there were to be a debate.
They won it all but just like every other year they got an incredibly favorable draw, they have played 40 tournament games in North Carolina. It set up really nicely for UConn last year getting to play at MSG, it's set up nicely for Duke every year.This argument would be more compelling were it not for the fact that Duke won the national championship and Virginia didn't make the Sweet Sixteen.
The narrative that they got an easy draw is crazy.I'm shocked that you take issue with my post, but they drubbed a 2 seed to make the final four. Once they got there, I'm not sure the committee had much to do with them playing MSU (who, incidentally, they demolished).
Getting back to the point, making the argument that the committee overseeded Duke at 1 and underseeded Virginia at 2 becomes a lot less persuasive given the way things shook out.
Wasn't exactly taking issue with your post was just saying Duke got a favorable draw and shouldn't get home games in the tournament every year. They were clearly one of the best teams I just think often times the committee sets up a very favorable path for them to make a run. They did what they had to but it wasn't exactly a gauntlet.I'm shocked that you take issue with my post, but they drubbed a 2 seed to make the final four. Once they got there, I'm not sure the committee had much to do with them playing MSU (who, incidentally, they demolished).
Getting back to the point, making the argument that the committee overseeded Duke at 1 and underseeded Virginia at 2 becomes a lot less persuasive given the way things shook out.
I don't consider a home game against San Diego State remotely tough, You're right about Utah being underseeded at 5 but Georgetown was way over seeded at 4. I think Utah would have been their toughest matchup until the title game but refs took Delon Wright out of the game right away.The narrative that they got an easy draw is crazy.
Utah was their 5 seed. How? Utah was a Top 10-12 team.
San Diego State was their 8-seed. How? They were on par with teams like West Virginia (5 seed) by all metrics.
Gonzaga was legit. If you were ranking the teams most thought were the best, UK/Duke/Wisconsin/Zona were the top 4...Gonzaga was arguably the next best (healthy Virginia was probably better, but...).
I'd say Duke got a really tough draw, and beat really good teams to win the whole thing.
The narrative that they got an easy draw is crazy.
Utah was their 5 seed. How? Utah was a Top 10-12 team.
San Diego State was their 8-seed. How? They were on par with teams like West Virginia (5 seed) by all metrics.
Gonzaga was legit. If you were ranking the teams most thought were the best, UK/Duke/Wisconsin/Zona were the top 4...Gonzaga was arguably the next best (healthy Virginia was probably better, but...).
I'd say Duke got a really tough draw, and beat really good teams to win the whole thing.
Coach K has really flipped on One and Dones.