RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,395
- Reaction Score
- 99,199
A darkly evil yet oh so delicious black comedy, superbly written, directed and acted, led by George C. Scott:
A darkly evil yet oh so delicious black comedy, superbly written, directed and acted, led by George C. Scott:
this is my favorite one
"And I was feeding you Jackie boy, feeding you ... you remember?" "Damn gammy leg...." I have the CD. I mention it to those under 40 and get blank stares.
Episodic TV just doesn't get any better.
]
In Sergio Leone's brilliant "For a Few Dollars More", there were some moments of wonderful dark comedy:
I’m afraid it does:
Whatever good can be said about Breaking Bad, it fell radically short of developing complex women characters and relationships. (This may explain part of the reason why its demographic was so sharply skewed towards male audiences, particularly between the ages of 20 and 50.) I have not watched the series in years. But apart from Skyler and (in later seasons) the occasional appearance of Lydia, there were scarcely any significant women characters at all. Hank’s spouse merely served as a vehicle for an entertaining idiosyncrasy-kleptomania. When the joke wore off, as it certainly must, the character was relegated to obscurity by the end of the first or second season. This tells you a lot about the limitations in the writing, at least as far as developing meaningful women characters.)
Even the above Mad Men analysis (Whatever its merit) comes nowhere near exhausting all of the things they could be discussed in this single episode. I rarely found that to be the case in breaking bad, many episodes of which did not even figure a female character. By comparison, figurations of “mothers,”, alone, in Mad Men is well worth the price of admission and rivals just about any comparable treatment ever to appear on television.
Episodic TV just doesn't get any better.
Damn lucky dog?Best Christmas present of the decade was the complete series CD set!
Connie, women as drug runners, distributors generally don't cut except in being airplane mules, particularly when you can trust 12 year old male apprentices on their bike cruisers. I found Skyler to make up for a lot of the shortcomings you are describing and her sister showed both admirable strength and flaws, just like a real person.
As for Mad Men, I knew people in the Ad game in the early 60s and they were as bad as air plane pilots, in service and flying the friendly skies, but the women for the most part were totally aware of what they were buying into, both the ones at home and the ones in the office. It's the realest "soap" I have ever seen.
BTW, the character of the left, banging her head on the glass ceiling, was my personal fav female character by far.
Breaking Bad's Skylar is an interesting character. But her presence on the show was not enough to fill the sizeable gap I noted. Moreover, that the series concerned drugs, drug cartels, etc. is no excuse. The Sopranos concerned the mob but allowed for marvelous development of plot, narrative and women characters well beyond the core mafiosi. Lorraine Buco; Gloria Trillo; Rosalie Aprile; Svetlana; Adriana; Janice; Irina; Meadow; Carmela; and of course Dr. Melfi. I would rank that series also as richer and far more rewarding than Breaking Bad.
As for "realest" soap . . . Realism is a genre, with its own conventions and forms; it is just as ideologically loaded as any other genre.
I’m afraid it does:
Whatever good can be said about Breaking Bad, it fell radically short of developing complex women characters and relationships. (This may explain part of the reason why its demographic was so sharply skewed towards male audiences, particularly between the ages of 20 and 50.) I have not watched the series in years. But apart from Skyler and (in later seasons) the occasional appearance of Lydia, there were scarcely any significant women characters at all. Hank’s spouse merely served as a vehicle for an entertaining idiosyncrasy-kleptomania. When the joke wore off, as it certainly must, the character was relegated to obscurity by the end of the first or second season. This tells you a lot about the limitations in the writing, at least as far as developing meaningful women characters.)
Even the above Mad Men analysis (Whatever its merit) comes nowhere near exhausting all of the things they could be discussed in this single episode. I rarely found that to be the case in breaking bad, many episodes of which did not even figure a female character. By comparison, figurations of “mothers,”, alone, in Mad Men is well worth the price of admission and rivals just about any comparable treatment ever to appear on television.