intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,931
- Reaction Score
- 60,234
So four Final Fours and a National Championship in five seasons is "nothing" to you.Luckily, he never wins anything....
So four Final Fours and a National Championship in five seasons is "nothing" to you.
Please tell me that was sarcasm.
He's Calipari - none of it counts.
For the time beingActually only his first two Final Fours don't count.
Correction...............a better coach. Kentucky was the better team.My God the excuses don't stop. Just admit it, you got beaten by a better team. Period.
Well if your program's goal is to develop players for the next level, instead of winning championships, as he stated back in April, then why would the players have been "stressed" against Wisconsin?? His excuses seem to change with each reporters questions and stories. But one thing is always true...the coach never takes responsibility for the losses of his teams !
Hmm. . . . . . . . Wisoconsin loss = stress relief.
So to him, losing is equivalent togetting laidmasturbating.
Correction.....a better coach. Kentucky was the better team.
This is ridiculous. They lost one game last year. That wasn't because of lack of leadership or a bad coach. It's because it's really, really hard to make it through an entire college basketball season without losing any games. The best team doesn't always win the tournament because a single-elimination tournament is a poor measure of the best team.
This was something I was trumpeting all year. They were good, but not historically good, and maybe not even the best team. Their SOS was not impressive, and they really suffered from Florida's down year.I agree in principle, but it's also fair to note that Kentucky only played two top ten teams all season (Wisconsin #3, Notre Dame #9) and could have conceivably lost both games (granted, they also could have won both, but you get the point).
They were obviously a great team, and in evaluating the entirety of their body of work, they were clearly the most dominant wire to wire. But I think Duke was the best team by April.
With the exception of a crazy bounce here or there to cost you a game, I'd like to think that the best "team" actually does win 6 in a row for the championship. They are the ones who in the face of "win or go home" win everytime.This is ridiculous. They lost one game last year. That wasn't because of lack of leadership or a bad coach. It's because it's really, really hard to make it through an entire college basketball season without losing any games. The best team doesn't always win the tournament because a single-elimination tournament is a poor measure of the best team.
Quite frankly, I forgot between Cal and Pitino which one knows he is a BSer and which one believes his own BS as per JC.