I’ve watched Jalen Hurts, Bama’s starting QB, a number of times. He’s like another RB in the backfield - great runner, but very average passer who frequently doesn’t see open receivers. The decision to go with the kid from Hawaii in the 2nd half was not on the spur of the moment. Bama had to be thinking about it for weeks and giving the kid lots of reps with the 1st team offense in practice.
The game tying throw on 4th down was huge, but it was also a bit lucky. On the reply, it was clear that the kid from Hawaii wasn’t throwing the ball to Ridley. He was off balance when he threw the ball in the general direction of another receiver, who was tightly covered in the back of the end zone. The ball was short and Ridley who had worked his way all the way across the end zone basically caught the pass in front of the intended receiver.I'm not even sure it was better than the last couple Bama-Clemson games BUT that ending will be remembered for a very long time. Freshman QB throwing a perfect deep ball to win the game. Epic.
I haven't even heard that much talk this morning about his game-tying touchdown throw, which was equally amazing if not more so.
The game tying throw on 4th down was huge, but it was also a bit lucky. On the reply, it was clear that the kid from Hawaii wasn’t throwing the ball to Ridley. He was off balance when he threw the ball in the general direction of another receiver, who was tightly covered in the back of the end zone. The ball was short and Ridley who had worked his way all the way across the end zone basically caught the pass in front of the intended receiver.
I don't follow football much, but I was in a sports bar when the game ended. The composure QB under pressure and precision of the pass were impressive.
But...wasn't it obvious to everyone watching the game that the only thing that (especially with the Alabama QB running around in the backfield) would beat Georgia was a deep pass? Why wasn't the Georgia secondary deep to give better coverage to such a play?
GA was playing “cover 2”, a two deep zone defense that should not give up a deep pass, with 2 safeties back to double cover any receiver running a deep pattern, but 3 things happened on the winning play.I don't follow football much, but I was in a sports bar when the game ended. The composure QB under pressure and precision of the pass were impressive.
But...wasn't it obvious to everyone watching the game that the only thing that (especially with the Alabama QB running around in the backfield) would beat Georgia was a deep pass? Why wasn't the Georgia secondary deep to give better coverage to such a play?
maybe....
If you are a great HS player, want to get exposure to the NFL and ( likely ) win a national championship, you go to Alabama. Very few players recruited by Alabama choose to go anywhere else. Alabama is about 6 deep at every position. And every player would start for any other team. If an NFL team chose to only draft Alabama players, they would likely win it all, too.True freshman moved the chains on offense the most. Their leading RB, WR and QB are all true freshman. That's incredible depth.
I just watched that play several times and I honestly can't tell who it's intended for.]
I agree that it’s hard to tell from the sideline camera view, but on ESPN this morning there was a camera view from behind the offense. From that view, it looked to me like the QB was looking right at the receiver in the back of the end zone when he threw the ball, and never even saw Ridley sprinting across the end zone from the other side of the field.
It sounds like you’re saying that, “Bama is bad for college football.” Now where have I heard something like that before?The "best game ever" would have seen Alabama lose.
They nearly always win the national championship game because all the best players, at every position, always go there. They had, on the bench, the number one recruit in the nation at QB. He replaced the previous year's number one recruit at QB ( a true freshman replacing a true freshman from last year).. And if he had failed, they would have trotted out another one.
The reason people want to categorize this game as "the best ever," is simply due to the fact that that the underdog made a game of it. Normally ( although I know Clemson won recently ), Alabama ends the game after about the first 10 minutes.
If the NFL were wide open ( i.e. no draft in inverse order of finish, etc ), the richest team would always win. The best players would always go where the money is, so that team would, 99% of the time, be the champs. Only the fans of the richest team would ever enjoy the sport's championship game, because the team with the best players usually wins. Smartly, the NFL has a method to create balance ( unless a team has a horrible GM and coach.....as many, apparently, do ), so we get different teams competing each year, with a reasonable chance of winning. Atlanta, for example, would have won last year except for a terrible decision by their coach.
The "best game ever" would have seen Alabama lose.
They nearly always win the national championship game because all the best players, at every position, always go there. They had, on the bench, the number one recruit in the nation at QB. He replaced the previous year's number one recruit at QB ( a true freshman replacing a true freshman from last year).. And if he had failed, they would have trotted out another one.