OT: Australian Open | Page 2 | The Boneyard

OT: Australian Open

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gritty effort from Keys coming back from a break down twice in the 4th to win. If she cleans up her errors she has a chance to be #1 at some point.
 
Wow good for Keys. She had more power than Venus, and it was easy power. Really like that young kid. Too bad Sloane Stevens sort of flamed out for the Americans - she rose quickly but just as quickly disappeared, so good for Madison Keys...
 
ericsandiego said:
Wow good for Keys. She had more power than Venus, and it was easy power. Really like that young kid. Too bad Sloane Stevens sort of flamed out for the Americans - she rose quickly but just as quickly disappeared, so good for Madison
Keys...
Expand ...

Its up to Keys and Townsend to keep up my interest in women's tennis........ Keys is better now..... but I love Townsend's game more. Actually, I'd rather watch Townsend play over any female.. include the Williams.
 
I love seeing Sharapove win OR lose. But, geez, I DO hate listening to her! Is that crap really necessary?
 
Waquoit said:
How can you hate Rafa?
Expand ...
Don't know. On the men's side not too many guys I always root against, but Rafa is one of them. I'd rather see anyone win but him. Maybe it's because I love Federer and I don't want to see Rafe ever win as many grand slams as him. Oh, plus, I hate his quirks on the court. I want to buy the guy some panties because he picks at them before every single point...
 
.-.
Novak just dispatched Canada's Raonic in, as almost always, straight sets.

Later tonight representatives of the world's biggest nuclear powers will vie for the right to throw atom bombs at each other.
We begin with a Russian semi between Ekaterina Makarova and Maria Sharapova about 9:30.
Then the Americans Madison and Serena blast away.

Who will achieve world domination?
 
And if Serena loses, I hope she does not throw a hissy-fit.
 
triaddukefan said:
I hope Serena beats Sharapova like a rented Russian Mule


(Please no comments from any Boneyard PETA members :rolleyes:)
Expand ...
Sharapova is super nice and well spoken off the court, but I just can't stand the shriekers on the court - Her and Azarenka can't lose enough for me.

Didn't the women's tennis association pass some sort of anti-shrieking rule going forward, but they allow the current crop to continue with it? Serena is the perfect example of a player who used to be super loud but since then toned it down, and it had zero impact on her game. Azarenka is especially annoying because her shriek is almost more like a wail, which instantly stops if she hits the ball into the net. UGH! Anyway I'm with you. Down with Sharapova!
 
Novak has just gone ahead of Stan 2-1 in sets in the semis. Very fine ball striking.
 
.-.
There appeared to be a strange ruling in the second set with Williams serving at game point when the chair umpire took it to deuce after just one serve. Did I see/remember it wrong?
 
Against anyone else, Maria Sharapova wins the match. However, if Serena has her serve going, it is impossible for anyone to beat her regardless of how well they play.
 
VAUConnFan said:
There appeared to be a strange ruling in the second set with Williams serving at game point when the chair umpire took it to deuce after just one serve. Did I see/remember it wrong?
Expand ...
Serena shouted "come on" before the point was over and received a hinder call against her so she lost the point. it happened to her before in the U.S Open final against Sam Stosur.
 
Pete said:
Serena shouted "come on" before the point was over and received a hinder call against her so she lost the point. it happened to her before in the U.S Open final against Sam Stosur.
Expand ...

Thank you. I remember the point being taken away from her at the US Open on a clear winner that Stosur had no chance of returning.

IMO, if they allow the screeching and hollering, then the hinder call is a bit disingenuous.
 
.-.
Serena learned her lesson from that US Open - she accepted it and then immediately worked at keeping her tennis game under control, which she succeeded at. There was a funny bit shortly after that hindrance call; she won another point, then had a very careful pause before uttering the "Come On." :D

The reaction on the match point let cord was amusing too. That must have been a wonderfully disruptive adrenaline dump.
 
Towards the end of the match it looked like Nerves were getting to Serena as she missed some returns that she would have won reports with. But almost every time her powerful serve would get her points. She had 18 Aces in the 2 set match and finished it off with an Ace.

Great win for Serena ad Maria played extremely well and could have easily won without Serena's serve.
 
VAUConnFan said:
Thank you. I remember the point being taken away from her at the US Open on a clear winner that Stosur had no chance of returning.

IMO, if they allow the screeching and hollering, then the hinder call is a bit disingenuous.
Expand ...
I agree. The hinder should only be call if it actually disrupts play. To call a hinder on a clear winner is kind of an oxymoron
 
VAUConnFan said:
Thank you. I remember the point being taken away from her at the US Open on a clear winner that Stosur had no chance of returning.

IMO, if they allow the screeching and hollering, then the hinder call is a bit disingenuous.
Expand ...
I agree. The hinder should only be call if it actually disrupts play. To call a hinder on a clear winner is kind of an oxymoron
 
Tlhe rules committee does not want to create extra judgment responsibilities for the ump. You could
imagine the disputes that would follow. Why it could turn mild-mannered players into John McEnroe!
 
I don't think it would be that bad, it is not a call that is made very often. What Serena did in this game was a clear hinder. Maria had a play on the ball and did return it. Against Stosur it was a winner and Sam had no chance of getting to the ball.
 
.-.
Congrats to Djoker and Serena the queen o' tennis.

She sailed through the Australian Open. She's won the other three majors at least twice, all recently at least once. She fell at Roland Garros each of the five years she won the Aussie previously, but that doesn't mean that this conclusively isn't her year to do something that hasn't happened in 27 years.

There was a time when Serena was at 14 slams, at which point Martina and Chrissy were within reach. It took a while, mainly for physical reasons, but she surpassed them. At this point, the distance between 19 and 22 isn't prohibitive at all. It would be unprecedented to win so many Slams at her age and older, but if she makes hay now, she could well become the greatest champion of the Open Era.

And if she did get to 22...might she get to 24? Seems unlikely to say the least, but I'd love for it to happen. With all due respect to Margaret Court, I think Serena would be a more fitting greatest champion for the sport.

With the singles, doubles, and Olympic success, I think there's no question she's the GOAT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,086
Messages
4,552,603
Members
10,435
Latest member
DukeBlue


Top Bottom