One time transfer rule seems likely to be approved | Page 2 | The Boneyard

One time transfer rule seems likely to be approved

why not just give teams with losing records five attempts to get a first down and teams with winning records four. It seems like that would accomplish your goal Of equalizing the games.

And if you think that might be a little too much of an equalizer, we can go with your transfer rule change. But why make it a one time transfer. If your theory is correct, wouldn‘t it be best to just make every player a free agent every year. We could see entire teams transfer from one school to another. Using your logic, that would be a good thing. Or would you want only teams with losing records be able to grab other team’s players. Just think, good programs would be feeders for the crappy teams.

Do you have disdain for all the sports that use a draft order based on winning percentage which is all of them - baseball, basketball, football, hockey, etc etc? You must only be a fan of college sports as all the others incentivize losing and thus have destroyed the integrity of their respective leagues. Yes, billions of sport entertain industry and millions of fans have been duped watching those other impure competitions where losing has a small silver lining.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,285
Messages
4,561,399
Members
10,455
Latest member
UConnGabby
Top Bottom