Listen Chief I'm about the least emotional poster here.
You can't compare places like Michigan and Connecticut. First of all, the team RR left behind was not nearly as bad as this team is. They had Denard frigging Robinson for God's sake.
Second, Michigan has a huge institutional advantage over UConn. I'm not even in the mood to spend a hour detailing every piece of that because if you are clueless enough to try and draw a parallel it's a waste of time.
I agree as I said Uconn is not Michigan. But two things:
1.) RR brought denard but their defense under GRob took a severe step backwards as far as B1G talent. I follow them heavily due to family ... who will be taunting me the entire Uconn game. One thing I know is that their defense became garbage. That changed immediately once Hoke came into place ...THE SAME PLAYERS.
Most of our Dline and Oline are Vetrans and were recruited by Edsall.. you telling me Edsall recruited good for the years he was here but all of a sudden just didnt know how to evaluate talent anymore? How about this .. give Foley one year on that line and lets see if theres any difference whatsoever to compete in the AAC and against FCS schools.
2.) I know the advantages Michigan has ... again I'm using them as an example (they are in big 10 they took a severe talent blow in most areas under RR and played under a scheme that just did not work in the B1G). Ive been to AA .. the campus is amazing, a true college town. The stadium right smack in the middle, they are the blue bloods of college football. They have an insane endowment and are essentially a midwest ivy league. But they also compete against far better programs. We can only compare ourselves to the rest of the AAC may be much less ... but I think the right coach can make us competitive enough in this new league to keep our name in the realignment pool.
I have seen regression from players over under this coaching staff. The same players playing worse and worse each year. Thats poor coaching, thats poor leadership. The right coach knows how to make the most with what he has. Are you telling me that you truely believe PP is making the most with what we have and all is lost because it doesn't get any better?
Also I still think Lagow had more upside then Whitmer... but thats just an opinion and as we all know everyone has one and they mean nothing until something is proven.