- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 175
- Reaction Score
- 810
I've seen differences of opinion scattered across various recruiting threads, and thought I'd ask the question here in its own thread.
Reed is on board. We're recruiting McNeeley (wing) as well as several guards with varying levels of ballhandling skills (Brea, Hausen, Mahaney).
Assuming Castle leaves but everyone else stays (Diarra, Karaban, and the remaining four rising sophomores), how many new players are we brining in?
If McNeeley commits, is that it and we drop our interest in the guards?
Or, assuming McNeeley commits, are we also bringing in one of the guards as well?
IMO, we should be bringing in three players in total, so ideally Reed, McNeeley and a guard (ideally with some handle to assist Diarra and Nowell with ballhandling and distribution). That would provide cover for injuries and give us a deep rotation that was key this year.
Some have argued that this might block the progress of some of the rising sophomores and freshmen. I can see that as a valid opinion as well.
So I'm curious where you all stand. What say you?
Reed is on board. We're recruiting McNeeley (wing) as well as several guards with varying levels of ballhandling skills (Brea, Hausen, Mahaney).
Assuming Castle leaves but everyone else stays (Diarra, Karaban, and the remaining four rising sophomores), how many new players are we brining in?
If McNeeley commits, is that it and we drop our interest in the guards?
Or, assuming McNeeley commits, are we also bringing in one of the guards as well?
IMO, we should be bringing in three players in total, so ideally Reed, McNeeley and a guard (ideally with some handle to assist Diarra and Nowell with ballhandling and distribution). That would provide cover for injuries and give us a deep rotation that was key this year.
Some have argued that this might block the progress of some of the rising sophomores and freshmen. I can see that as a valid opinion as well.
So I'm curious where you all stand. What say you?