Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Jerry27, post: 2264602, member: 418"] We don't now and didn't have the same options available as far as adding teams so the fantasy of adding x school hurts our chances is BS, what other school was available? What was the better alternative? You claim to have known (once again) what the better strategy is/was but you offer no alternatives. They want to change the narrative. One way of doing that is by saying things loudly and often how you want to be viewed. Or we could sit around and wait for it to fix itself. And Aresco was a high level network executive he would have had a job elsewhere if the conference folded he wasn't doing it to save his job. Nor was he adding teams in a vacuum, every member had a say in it. you also said it left schools with no where to go; Where were any of us going? Newsflash; NO ONE WANTS US. The only thing you've said that we agree on is we should have never agreed to give the conference control of our T3 rights. [/QUOTE]