This is what I don't really get about this thread, and I suppose it's because I don't buy what I guess is now conventional wisdom on here, that the Ollie to OKC rumors were the coordinated efforts of a group of writers (or coaches, maybe, I can't keep track) to damage UConn's recruiting.
Sportswriters get these things wrong all the time. All. The. Time. It's part of the gig. When have you ever seen a reporter then write an article about how he was wrong about the rumor he was reporting or, even crazier, apologize to the subject of the rumor?
What bothers me - and I suppose this is a commentary on the way these things tend to be reported rather than any reporter specifically - is the lack of transparency.
I get that there are going to be unnamed sources, but when you tweet something as provocative as "Despite Ollie's statement, he actually does have a lot of interest in the OKC job," you had better be sure that it's a good source. If it's somebody Kevin Ollie had coffee with one time, it would probably be best to resist the urge to press send.
And yes, I know it is technically still possible that Ollie was interested in the job - and in fact, that is what I believed as recently as yesterday - but if he was ever a serious candidate, you have to think I takes longer than 24 hours for the rumor to be squashed, especially when by the sources own admission, there has been no direct contact between the two parties.
Meanwhile, Ollie twice in the span of 24 hours stated that he would not be pursuing any other jobs, the one this morning being more definitive. So, apparently if we are to believe the narrative they will soon begin spinning (that Ollie "withdrew" because he wasn't getting the job), Ollie was contacted about, expressed interest in, and was turned down within that span, likely without ever being interviewed. I find this hard to believe unless I am completely off on the timetable.
I don't think any of these reporters are tossing and turning at night worrying about UConn, but could some of them be quicker on the trigger than others when it comes to passing along negative information? I think so, especially a guy like Woj, who as recently as last season reported on Calhoun being rejected by BC with the same amount of non-verifiable sources.
Reporters definitely get this stuff wrong, but that doesn't mean your credibility doesn't take a hit when you do.