Sandro Mamukelashvili.
Adams is not even close to being one of the best guards in the country, he had 99 turnovers, shot 43%, and had too many dead games. He is talented for sure, and could turn into one of the top guards in the country, but he is distant in that conversation. He is not even on the draft board for 2017, and also 2018, that could certainly change.
Diarra, Cobb, Carlton, Larrier and Polley resemble front court players, at least superficially.So the solution is to have no front court players at all?
Diarra, Cobb, Carlton, Larrier and Polley resemble front court players, at least superficially.
And yet, there are five of them!!Combined games in a UConn uniform: 2
Here's the thing: I'm on record as thinking that--providing we fill our roster out a bit (not a guarantee) and that Gilbert and Larrier (and Diarra to a lesser extent) stay health--I think this team can actually be sneaky good. We'd have a true PG, a dynamite combo guard who can run the point, a sniper in CV, and an all around stud scorer in Larrier. That team can win games when it jells and the injured get their legs.
But without a post player I'm confident in, or back-ups (and I think MAL would have gotten good minutes off the bench), I'm much less confident.
Adams is not even close to being one of the best guards in the country, he had 99 turnovers, shot 43%, and had too many dead games. He is talented for sure, and could turn into one of the top guards in the country, but he is distant in that conversation. He is not even on the draft board for 2017, and also 2018, that could certainly change.
I imagine if we didn't have that mid-January to early February stretch where got over .500 (I think we won seven of eight) Enoch would have gotten a lot more PT as the season winded down. Once a winning record and a post season appearance became a possibility, things changed, prioritizing the effort to win games over allowing future starters to gain experience took over.I believe Enoch should have played more than Brimah the last 1/3 of the year - to see what he could do before this type of thing happened. We weren't going anywhere last season.
When you're a D1 head coach, it's always about winning. If you don't win, you get replaced. A good head coach develops players AND wins.I imagine if we didn't have that mid-January to early February stretch where got over .500 (I think we won seven of eight) Enoch would have gotten a lot more PT as the season winded down. Once a winning record and a post season appearance became a possibility, things changed, prioritizing the effort to win games over allowing future starters to gain experience took over.
If we're replacing players because they can't defend, then what is KO looking for? We were a pretty solid defensive team, 63rd rated adjusted defense and the 3rd best defensive team in the conference. For a team that was 16-17 that's pretty good...