Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Ollie fighting to keep his job..Link from ESPN
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="BlueDogs, post: 2619150, member: 891"] The basic rule of contract construction is you read what it says to understand the intent of the parties in their agreement. You don't add what should have been there. Where there is ambiguity, then a judge or arbiter may look outside the four corners of the agreement to ascertain contract language meaning. The argument that Ollie is involved in "minor" infractions is at least on the surface a losing argument. UConn is entitled to the bargain (their lawyers were smart - it was the perfect proviso because it's hard for KO to object to its inclusion. What's he going to say? "No, I should be permitted break NCAA rules"). KO's not so smart lawyers should have put qualifications on it such as "material violation" or "material violation, which after NCAA investigation, results in any sanction that results in [name bad punishments]". So KO is down to arguing a few things - anticipatory breach, breach of the implied covenant good faith and fair dealing, and potentially tortious interference with contract depending on what UConn and its "agents" where doing beforehand. The only argument that really sustains in regards to "it's only minor infractions" is commercial reasonableness which means all contract terms are interpreted in the context of what is generally understood as reasonable and customary under the circumstances. The line of attack that firing for minor infractions is unreasonable and doesn't rise to a level of just cause is on very thin ice, because everybody in college sports knows the NCAA rules are very exacting and particular, and also the NCAA previously sanctioned UConn when KO took over and the school had a heightened interest in ensuring compliance. So, KO is hard pressed to argue immateriality. With exception of UConn potentially going out talking to new candidates before he was fired, KO is on the losing side of the case. My prediction is they settle for $5 Million with an extended payout period. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Ollie fighting to keep his job..Link from ESPN
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom