- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 3,256
- Reaction Score
- 11,296
That's actually a sidebar, there's a whole piece on him and the job he didAgain no problem with where he is, but to make that whole thing about the things he says and not mention his brilliant coaching was weak sauce.
That's actually a sidebar, there's a whole piece on him and the job he did
Absolutely runyonesque.I'm not the biggest Eamonn Brennan fan but this is a great line:
"The NCAA tournament is characterized by its last-second madness. Our most recent national champion's best quality was how it wrung the life out of crunchtime comebacks before they ever had a chance to begin."
I'm not the biggest Eamonn Brennan fan but this is a great line:
"The NCAA tournament is characterized by its last-second madness. Our most recent national champion's best quality was how it wrung the life out of crunchtime comebacks before they ever had a chance to begin."
Exactly.Who cares about the ranking but it exposes that the criteria they stated from the beginning is a crock of .
Who cares about the ranking but it exposes that the criteria they stated from the beginning is a crock of .
With that as criteria, it seems impossible that he wasn't #1, particularly since there will be people ahead of him that he has beaten, UF he beat twice!
This article was the first I have seen which stated that the rankings were based on a 2 year period. I have no problem with KO's ranking but I sure do with K's inevitable top 3.
Where does it say that? And I agree.