Offseason Interview Series: BD's Thoughts on the Fans & Scheduling | The Boneyard

Offseason Interview Series: BD's Thoughts on the Fans & Scheduling

Status
Not open for further replies.

CTMike

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
11,420
Reaction Score
40,763
Another good read.

I would argue that I enjoyed losing to Michigan more than barely escaping Stony Brook... But, it's clear that Diaco gets it : win first.

Which makes some of the decisions this past season all the more puzzling, but, dead horses, etc.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
So the key to turning the program around is playing cupcakes.

Too much is made of what the matchup is? Yeah we are sheep who'd rather watch a win against Norfolk State than a competitive game in either direction against a legitimate opponent.

I know when we were good you could barely tell the difference between Murray State, Virginia, Pittsburgh and Lehigh. I treasure the win against Rhode Island - that was sweet.
 

ShakyTheMohel

Is it 11:11 yet?
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,813
Reaction Score
16,734
90% of what BD is saying is spot on. He did a good job of taking accountability for why the fans aren't showing up.

I think the flaw in his argument about the non-conference schedule is that conference games in the AAC are weak. If you are at Iowa in the Big 10, it's okay to schedule cupcakes out of conference when you know you are going to play Michigan, Ohio State and Wisconsin within the conference. But when your conference includes Temple and Tulane...you need to play strong out of conference schools to give the fans a good home schedule to watch and to build your bowl profile.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
782
Reaction Score
756
it does not matter what fiasco thinks or says; its just a matter of time or timelyness before the next regime is called up from minors or called in from bullpen
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,093
Reaction Score
24,542
Damn it. Now I have to change my undertitle. The unintentional comedy might just keep me sucked into this mess. BOB! you play just about the weakest schedule in American, if you can't get wins against this schedule, where are they going to come from?
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,429
Reaction Score
4,540
90% of what BD is saying is spot on. He did a good job of taking accountability for why the fans aren't showing up.

I think the flaw in his argument about the non-conference schedule is that conference games in the AAC are weak. If you are at Iowa in the Big 10, it's okay to schedule cupcakes out of conference when you know you are going to play Michigan, Ohio State and Wisconsin within the conference. But when your conference includes Temple and Tulane...you need to play strong out of conference schools to give the fans a good home schedule to watch and to build your bowl profile.
So how did UConn do against Temple and Tulane this past season? Everyone keeps saying how weak the AAC is, but UConn can't seem to beat these teams.
 

UCFBfan

Semi Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
5,838
Reaction Score
11,549
So how did UConn do against Temple and Tulane this past season? Everyone keeps saying how weak the AAC is, but UConn can't seem to beat these teams.
I don't think he's saying their weak. I think he's saying that there's no interest in playing them. Even when we were pre-Big East and played Temple there was no interest. The point he was making was that the Iowas and Wisconsins of the world schedule cupcakes because their home slates for conference games include power programs that people have interest in watching. We could schedule UMass, URI, Buffalo, and a directional Michigan school every year if we're playing a B1G or even an ACC schedule for the rest of the year. Playing Temple, Tulsa, Tulane, etc....not really drawing the casual fans interest, let alone the die hard fan.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
So the key to turning the program around is playing cupcakes.

Too much is made of what the matchup is? Yeah we are sheep who'd rather watch a win against Norfolk State than a competitive game in either direction against a legitimate opponent.

I know when we were good you could barely tell the difference between Murray State, Virginia, Pittsburgh and Lehigh. I treasure the win against Rhode Island - that was sweet.

Whaler you missed the point and are focusing on the cupcakes rather than the Marketing strategy. Yes-Marketing. College Football is a business and the subject is getting cheeks in the seats. What Diaco is saying is regardless of who you play (within reason), a 4-0 start gets the fan base buzzing and creates tremendous momentum. Conversely an 0-4 start dissipates fan interest and kills the season. Early on, it takes time (kind of like pre season) for the team to jell and gain confidence. It would be great if every win came against top 25 and P5 teams but that is not reality. Further a loss to a Towson State or a Villanova can put an even bigger dent in the image than a loss to Missouri. For UCONN, Villanova and Army are must wins next year and at the same time could easily be losses.

Although the emphasis of the P5 is strength of schedule for playoff purposes, I did a little checking for next year and Florida State plays Texas State, TN Chattanooga. Clemson plays Wofford and Appalachian State (MI losing to them was a disaster for their program) Alabama plays LA Monroe, Middle TN and Charleston Southern.

I agree, with Diaco, too much is made of matchups. Not saying you play all FCS teams but we have to WIN. If UCONN starts winning and going to bowl games the fans will come in spite of the increased competition everywhere for the entertainment dollar. Beating Missouri and or BYU would be huge for UCONN. In case you haven't noticed the American provides some pretty formidable competition. Winning a championship in this league is no small task by any means.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
I don't think he's saying their weak. I think he's saying that there's no interest in playing them. Even when we were pre-Big East and played Temple there was no interest. The point he was making was that the Iowas and Wisconsins of the world schedule cupcakes because their home slates for conference games include power programs that people have interest in watching. We could schedule UMass, URI, Buffalo, and a directional Michigan school every year if we're playing a B1G or even an ACC schedule for the rest of the year. Playing Temple, Tulsa, Tulane, etc....not really drawing the casual fans interest, let alone the die hard fan.

I agree but remember, the whole point of the AAC TV deal with games on Fridays is to gain exposure for the conference so the AAC games develop more interest. What hurts the process is when the fans see empty stadiums. As it has been written this is a growing problem everywhere but definitely has to be addressed. On that note, I believe UCONN should be selling tickets for $5.00 just to get fans in the seats.

The exposure for the conference on the Friday night and weekday games is very helpful for brand development.

Here are some stats from the Nielsen ratings:

Friday, August 29
0.7 1.08M 7:00 PM BYU/UConn ESPN
0.7 955K 10:30 PM UNLV/Arizona ESPN
0.4 592K 9:00 PM Colorado St./Colorado FS1
0.1 221K 9:00 PM UTSA/Houston ESPNU

Over one million viewer saw UCONN play BYU

Friday, September 19
1.0 1.36M 8:00 PM UConn/USF ESPN

1.36 Million watched the nightmare in Tampa last year

Saturday, September 27

0.1 109K 4:00 PM Temple/UConn ESPNEWS (YOU ARE RIGHT NO INTEREST)
0.2 309K 3:30 PM Wake Forest/Louisville ESPNU

Then again only 109,000 tuned in on Saturday to watch UCONN Temple. Louisville Wake Forest didn't do much better with 309,000. This shows the value of exposure from the Friday night games for UCONN and the American

Thursday, October 23
0.8 1.22M 7:30 PM Miami/Virginia Tech ESPN
0.3 395K 7:00 PM UConn/ECU ESPNU

UCONN ECU drew almost 400,000 fans up against Miami-VA Tech which isn't too bad considering they were going head to head.

My point in posting this is Mike Aresco is correct in his strategy that although somewhat inconvenient the Week day games are excellent exposure for the growth of the American.
 

UCFBfan

Semi Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
5,838
Reaction Score
11,549
I agree but remember, the whole point of the AAC TV deal with games on Fridays is to gain exposure for the conference so the AAC games develop more interest. What hurts the process is when the fans see empty stadiums. As it has been written this is a growing problem everywhere but definitely has to be addressed. On that note, I believe UCONN should be selling tickets for $5.00 just to get fans in the seats.

The exposure for the conference on the Friday night and weekday games is very helpful for brand development.

Here are some stats from the Nielsen ratings:

Friday, August 29
0.7 1.08M 7:00 PM BYU/UConn ESPN
0.7 955K 10:30 PM UNLV/Arizona ESPN
0.4 592K 9:00 PM Colorado St./Colorado FS1
0.1 221K 9:00 PM UTSA/Houston ESPNU

Over one million viewer saw UCONN play BYU

Friday, September 19
1.0 1.36M 8:00 PM UConn/USF ESPN

1.36 Million watched the nightmare in Tampa last year

Saturday, September 27

0.1 109K 4:00 PM Temple/UConn ESPNEWS (YOU ARE RIGHT NO INTEREST)
0.2 309K 3:30 PM Wake Forest/Louisville ESPNU

Then again only 109,000 tuned in on Saturday to watch UCONN Temple. Louisville Wake Forest didn't do much better with 309,000. This shows the value of exposure from the Friday night games for UCONN and the American

Thursday, October 23
0.8 1.22M 7:30 PM Miami/Virginia Tech ESPN
0.3 395K 7:00 PM UConn/ECU ESPNU

UCONN ECU drew almost 400,000 fans up against Miami-VA Tech which isn't too bad considering they were going head to head.

My point in posting this is Mike Aresco is correct in his strategy that although somewhat inconvenient the Week day games are excellent exposure for the growth of the American.
I don't think anyone is arguing that being on National TV is a bad thing. The simple point is that scheduling cupcakes works when your fans, both casual and die hard, care about who you play in conference. Right now, we don't have that so scheduling cupcakes or non-regional teams is hurting us. I understand that no regional teams outside UMass will schedule us because they are a bunch of c%^kblockers but it's still the reality UConn must face and fix to get fans into the stadium.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
Whaler you missed the point and are focusing on the cupcakes rather than the Marketing strategy. Yes-Marketing. College Football is a business and the subject is getting cheeks in the seats. What Diaco is saying is regardless of who you play (within reason), a 4-0 start gets the fan base buzzing and creates tremendous momentum. Conversely an 0-4 start dissipates fan interest and kills the season. Early on, it takes time (kind of like pre season) for the team to jell and gain confidence. It would be great if every win came against top 25 and P5 teams but that is not reality. Further a loss to a Towson State or a Villanova can put an even bigger dent in the image than a loss to Missouri. For UCONN, Villanova and Army are must wins next year and at the same time could easily be losses.

Although the emphasis of the P5 is strength of schedule for playoff purposes, I did a little checking for next year and Florida State plays Texas State, TN Chattanooga. Clemson plays Wofford and Appalachian State (MI losing to them was a disaster for their program) Alabama plays LA Monroe, Middle TN and Charleston Southern.

I agree, with Diaco, too much is made of matchups. Not saying you play all FCS teams but we have to WIN. If UCONN starts winning and going to bowl games the fans will come in spite of the increased competition everywhere for the entertainment dollar. Beating Missouri and or BYU would be huge for UCONN. In case you haven't noticed the American provides some pretty formidable competition. Winning a championship in this league is no small task by any means.

I didn't miss it. I disagree. Schedule matters with respect to attendance.

People were somewhat excited about BYU and Boise. Nobody was excited about Stony Brook.

People are planning trips to Missouri. People went to Michigan.

Kalamazoo not so much.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
I didn't miss it. I disagree. Schedule matters with respect to attendance.

People were somewhat excited about BYU and Boise. Nobody was excited about Stony Brook.

People are planning trips to Missouri. People went to Michigan.

Kalamazoo not so much.

Yes, schedules definitely matter when it comes to attendance. We added 2000 temporary seats for the Michigan game so no argument here. The subject is creating a long term winning atmosphere again at UCONN. So in that regard having a few less intense games helps us get there quicker. Folks at Alabama don't get as excited for Charleston Southern as they do for LSU anymore than UCONN women fans get excited for College of Charleston as compared to Notre Dame. No question who we play matters but we are in the early critical stages of a program rebuild and ending the losing streak and going bowling needs to be a top priority.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,376
Reaction Score
68,269
Yes, schedules definitely matter when it comes to attendance. We added 2000 temporary seats for the Michigan game so no argument here. The subject is creating a long term winning atmosphere again at UCONN. So in that regard having a few less intense games helps us get there quicker. Folks at Alabama don't get as excited for Charleston Southern as they do for LSU anymore than UCONN women fans get excited for College of Charleston as compared to Notre Dame. No question who we play matters but we are in the early critical stages of a program rebuild and ending the losing streak and going bowling needs to be a top priority.

If it's a short term strategy to get some wins it makes some sense.

But the idea they can use Wisconsin's strategy is silly. They have a strong conference schedule. UConn does not.

He isn't even really right about those teams anyway. Unless Wisconsin scheduling teams like Alabama OOC is similar. Kansas State only has 3 OOC games - they are known for scheduling nothing OOC and had Auburn this year.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
If it's a short term strategy to get some wins it makes some sense.

But the idea they can use Wisconsin's strategy is silly. They have a strong conference schedule. UConn does not.

He isn't even really right about those teams anyway. Unless Wisconsin scheduling teams like Alabama OOC is similar. Kansas State only has 3 OOC games - they are known for scheduling nothing OOC and had Auburn this year.

Sorry, but I don't think UCONN's American conference schedule is weak.

I looked up Wisconsin's conference schedule and compared it to UCONN's. I just don't see it being anymore daunting than UCONN's. UCONN has beaten both Rutger's and Maryland in the past. One might argue that Wisconsin's schedule is tougher but to characterize UCONN's as weak in comparison is an over statement on your part.

WISCONSIN

Nebraska
Iowa
Northwestern
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Purdue
Minnesota

UCONN

UCF
ECU
Navy
Cincinnati
Houston
Temple
Tulane
USF
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
20,513
Reaction Score
44,465
This program is so low at the moment, that I actually agree with him in this. Priority number one has to be to get back to winning. As far as marquee opponents, the likes of Illinois and Indiana are going to be the highlights of our schedule at home as we go forward. I'm okay with that. Win some games and score touchdowns and that will bring people back.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,093
Reaction Score
24,542
noeynox said:
This program is so low at the moment, that I actually agree with him in this. Priority number one has to be to get back to winning. As far as marquee opponents, the likes of Illinois and Indiana are going to be the highlights of our schedule at home as we go forward. I'm okay with that. Win some games and score touchdowns and that will bring people back.

Much of the fan base is so new they don't fully appreciate how bad. We've been the last two seasons. It is nearly as difficult to have 2 wins as it does 2 losses. Given our schedule it might have been harder to do.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
3,892
Reaction Score
18,084
just can't believe that we are worse now than when we moved to 1A.
 
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
2,472
Reaction Score
4,896
It doesn't make me any less worried for your mental faculties.

Regarding UCONN vs. Wisconsin 2015 conference schedules based on polls
will back my statement that UCONN's American conference 2015 schedule is not weak in comparison with Wisconsin's B1G 2015 conference schedule.

A closer look at the actual standings from two polls USA Today 2013 and CBS 2014 will prove that there is logic to my stance that that Wisconsin's schedule is comparable to UCONN's. Rankings wise, I would call 2013 pretty much a wash because the P5 is always going to get favorable treatment. No doubt 2014 was better for the B1G but it was weighed down by UCONN, USF and Tulane, 3 teams that should show greater improvement in the next several years than Northwestern, Illinois and Purdue.

2013 USA TODAY -

Wisconsin---------21-------UCF--------11
Nebraska----------26-------ECU-------40
Iowa----------------31-------Navy------43
Minn---------------52-------Cincy------51
Maryland----------71-------Houston---54
Rutgers------------76-------Tulane-----68
North Western---84-------UCONN---100
Illinois------------94-------USF---------103
Purdue-----------115-------Temple-----110

AVG RANK ------63-------AVG RANK 64

Top 7

UCF
Wisconsin
Nebraska
Iowa
ECU
Navy
Houston

American had top team and 4 teams inn top 7
Oh thats right, it was all because of UCF's fluke year!

2014 CBS Poll

Wisconsin--------12-------UCF-------40
Nebraska---------23-------Cincy------42
Minn--------------31-------ECU-------49
Rutgers-----------47-------Navy------54
Iowa--------------60-------Houston--61
Maryland---------63------Temple----78
Illinois------------72------USF-------106
Northwestern----80-----Tulane-----108
Purdue-----------103-----UCONN---124

AVG RANK-------55-----AVG RANK 74

Top 7

Wisconsin
Nebraska
Minn
UCF
Cincy
Rutgers
Navy

American had 3 teams in top 7

Summary I would say Wisconsin's schedule is somewhat tougher than UCONN's but not that much tougher. No need to worry about my mental state.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
498
Guests online
3,225
Total visitors
3,723

Forum statistics

Threads
155,760
Messages
4,030,623
Members
9,864
Latest member
leepaul


Top Bottom