Official "REINSTATE MIKE FOLEY AS OL COACH IMMEDIATELY" Thread | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Official "REINSTATE MIKE FOLEY AS OL COACH IMMEDIATELY" Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The answer is right in front of your eyes.

We have good kids playing today (and I feel for them). The system worked - Norries Wilson then to Mike Foley. We developed solid FBS OLine. DeLeone sucks - this OLine is swirling down the toilet with him.
 
Whitmer just got sacked again, in the cafeteria in McMahon Hall.... bump!
 
.-.
Dez says changes are coming not just in terms of personnel, but "in terms of philosophy":

http://courantblogs.com/uconn-football/uconn-head-coach-paul-pasqualoni-post-syracuse/

Of course, there is only one change that the BY wants to see....bump!
I absolutely will parse PP's words as some of this is alarming

1 - Redshirt freshman tackle Dalton Gifford will start getting reps at tackle
Gifford has been on the two deep as a tackle all season but he has gotten any reps yet?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? WTF?!?!?!?!

2 - We have not been able to run the ball, especially in the past two weeks which is frustrating for us. We’ve gotten behind, been in a situation two weeks in a row now where we felt like we had to throw the ball to get back into the game
Unless something happened during the Temple game that I completely missed the only time we were behind in that game was when the kicked the game winning field goal in OT. How the F$%& does the head coach believe we were behind in that game?

3 - So the things we’re going to work on and have to improve on as we move forward but we also have to improve on as we move forward but we also have to try to establish some sort of run and the runs that we feel, the run concepts that we feel we would be the best at to try to narrow those down and do a good job with what we decide to do in an effort to take a little pressure off being in protection every single play when people know you have to throw it and they’re coming after you and putting the quarterback in a situation where he’s got to make every single play.
Huh?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

In the last two weeks people have really, really have brought multiple pressures and are pressuring against the run as well as the pass, a lot of extra people in there. It makes it hard when there’s slanting and moving up front and linebackers being added into these pressures to get the blocks finished and it’s usually not getting a guy cut of, we’re not staying on a guy quite long enough or getting surprised at the point of attack where there’s some un-scouted looks coming into it which you have to adjust to on the sideline and I understand that’s all a part of it and I think our kids do a good job. I think the staff does a good job of getting them on the sideline and getting a good look and a good understanding of exactly what we are seeing but at the same time it’s a challenge to get all that done under the circumstances.
Again, Huh?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I'm beginning to believe that senility has set in. Our (listed) backup LT is now going to finally begin getting reps (with one third of the season left), he thinks we 'got behind' in a game where the opponent did not tie us until the last minute of regulation, he made two statements about the same thing yet for the most part saying nothing in a manner that would have made Casey Stengel proud but in the process admitted that when the defense loads the box it is hard to block everyone. No s#it Sherlock. This is why teams run plays to take advantage of a loaded box such as quick slants or screens and on occasion moves the pocket or runs a misdirection.
 
Unbelievable. PP said that change of philosophy was to back to running the ball.

If you noticed the last 2 weeks we were passing more on first down. That didn't work so let's go back to run, run, pass, punt.

Read that and tell me he doesn't sound like a politician.

Didn't know about the Sio Moore and trainer fracus. (doctor or trainer?)

Sounds like a desperate clueless old man.
 
Every part that you typed, "huh???", I had to read at least three times in a row. I still didn't get what PP was trying to say, so I gave up. It was like reading a tale told by an idiot, with both sound and fury, signifying nothing...
 
FCF - do you watch the debates (not a political question) - do you believe everything they say?

If PP told you that Super Duper Weenie made the worse hot dog in America would you stop going just because PP said so?

Has any Head Coach in America really said what they want to say?

Don't risk an aneurysm over sound bites.
 
.-.
Don't risk an aneurysm over sound bites.

I think he's getting an aneurysm because he can't UNDERSTAND the soundbite!! It's not really English...
 
FCF - do you watch the debates (not a political question) - do you believe everything they say?

If PP told you that Super Duper Weenie made the worse hot dog in America would you stop going just because PP said so?

Has any Head Coach in America really said what they want to say?

Don't risk an aneurysm over sound bites.
Medic, look at the sound bites I responded to (as well as the responses). These weren't merely stretches of truth, these were statements that should make you wonder how connected to his job Pasqualoni really is. Please explain "We’ve gotten behind, been in a situation two weeks in a row now where we felt like we had to throw the ball to get back into the game". Better still, please explain the final two statements I posted. Afterwards, explain what the hell the Super Duper Weenie comment means. The only thing I can guess (based on your stance over the past 24+ hours) is that defending PP (even evidently his culinary choices) is quite an important part of your life.
 
I think he's getting an aneurysm because he can't UNDERSTAND the soundbite!! It's not really English...

Ever listen to Lou Holts @ length? Old skool coach speak.

555572_168188906649244_4698094_n.jpg
 
I have never much cared what coaches say since there is so much evidence of
what they actually do. At this point this is a joke - if they don't rectify this situation in December a lot us are going to need to make a tough decision. Can we continue to support this mess? They could seriously go like 1-11 next year if they bring this staff back.

Please don't let this clown kill this program.
 
"getting surprised at the point of attack where there are some un-scouted looks coming into it which you have to adjust to on the sideline and I understand that all is a part of it" Who wee this statement makes me really cringe. They weren't doing what we thought they were going to do so we got caught. Time to take away the keys.
 
Medic, look at the sound bites I responded to (as well as the responses). These weren't merely stretches of truth, these were statements that should make you wonder how connected to his job Pasqualoni really is. Please explain "We’ve gotten behind, been in a situation two weeks in a row now where we felt like we had to throw the ball to get back into the game". Better still, please explain the final two statements I posted. Afterwards, explain what the hell the Super Duper Weenie comment means. The only thing I can guess (based on your stance over the past 24+ hours) is that defending PP (even evidently his culinary choices) is quite an important part of your life.

Nope.. wrong. I read them and let them go. I don't get spun up to the high heavens over things I can't control. Do you really think he is trying to get you to understand his world. This is a sport, it is is not life or death. The season stinks, the team stinks, the coaching stinks - it really doesn't matter to me why it stinks or who's fault it is. I use college football and other sports as an escape. You want to see life and death and decison that impact life and death - come spend time with me. The drama, hyperbole, and bravado is way over the top. This is suppose to be fun. I promise myself each time I sign on that I will just let some comments go and move onto the next thread but my Type A personality doesn't let me. It's kinda of like you folks who need to slow down and look at a car wreck and then are somewhat disappointed when there is no carnage. You just can't help yourself doing it - even though most would puke if you saw something.

For clarity, I am a 13 year season ticket holder, been to all Bowl Games, travel to at least one away game a year (Morgantown only BE stadium I haven't been to and can you blame me). I'm am not a college sport or team sport neophyte. I liked Randy (don't like the way he left) but still find it fun to poke at him since he left. I think PP is a good leader of a program but I think his OC sucks and a change has to be made sooner than later. I think putting ALL the blame on the coaches is disengenuous (this is usually where i get in trouble) but can see the side/flip argument that the Coach is the "CEO" and the ultimate buck should stop with him. I get twisted when folks says you can't blame the kids and the coaches put them in a position to fail but often the same people see no reason not to blame and the kid who airballs a game winning three or strikes out with the bases loaded. I have my opinions - you and other have theirs. It doesn't have to be hand to hand combat over every opinion.

... and you live Fairfield County and have never been to Super Duper Weenie in Fairfield - shame on you.
 
.-.
I used to live right by Super Duper. The other place is better. Rawley's (sp?). It's been like 10 years.

I agree there are plenty of players who share some blame. For example, while the blocking scheme changes on the offensive line have been a negative - the offensive line also lacks talent.

I like Whitmer and think he has potential - but he makes some terrible decisions.

The staff can't seem to motivate - but we saw how fired up they were for Maryland so clearly the players have the ability to generate their own motivation.
 
Never been to Super Duper Weenie, never even heard of it until now.
in his
I've heard Lou Holtz speak numeropus times and once you get through the lisp and the slobbering his words do make sense and normally mean something. Reading a transcript (and not needing to sort through the obstacles of his speech), similar to we were able to do with P's comments, ad there would be nothing to ve concerned with.

I've heard many Yogi-isms and with most of them, after some analysis you can see what he was attempting to say and realize thaat there was a good amount of logic and truth in those statements.

What P stated 9in the two passages where I responded 'Huh?', can only be compared to Casey Stengel, very late in his Yankee career when he would nod out in the dugout during the game and when a decision needed to be made, would be woken by one of the players, ask Yogi what the situation was and then (depending on how much of what Yogi said sunk in) either make a decision or ask Yogi what he would do (and then do that).

I've heard coach speak for decades. If either of the two passages in question were attempts at coach speak (talking in a circle to say nothing while answering a question he doesn't want to answer), they were coach speak from someone with no background in the subject matter and little experience in fielding questions. I find it alarming that he couldn't get around what he was attempting to get around without sounding like a buffoon. He's been doing this for too long.

I also realize that it is quite possible for a competent person to misspeak on occasion. I do find the comments on Gifford and the two weeks on a row getting behind to be cause for concern however as either the former was a very blatant misstatement (and Gifford has been taking second unit reps, when fully healthy for the time he has been the #2 LT) which for a head coach is not much different from a department manager not remembering which of his employees has what responsibilities or we are running our practices differently than what has been the standard for more than half a century (in and of itself not necessarily an issue but the results do speak volumes of the effectiveness) employed by basically every successful college football program. The Temple statement however is just mind-boggling on how he can be so clueless on what happened a week earlier. If a head coach doesn't know this, I don't know what to say.
 
A sure sign this coaching staff is not all that bright is they prepared more for the run than for the pass the week before the WMU game. More than just a little too.

Are you kidding me?
 
.-.
The "I'm watching Will Beatty play on Sundays right now" bump
 
Never been to Super Duper Weenie, never even heard of it until now.
in his
I've heard Lou Holtz speak numeropus times and once you get through the lisp and the slobbering his words do make sense and normally mean something. Reading a transcript (and not needing to sort through the obstacles of his speech), similar to we were able to do with P's comments, ad there would be nothing to ve concerned with.

I've heard many Yogi-isms and with most of them, after some analysis you can see what he was attempting to say and realize thaat there was a good amount of logic and truth in those statements.

What P stated 9in the two passages where I responded 'Huh?', can only be compared to Casey Stengel, very late in his Yankee career when he would nod out in the dugout during the game and when a decision needed to be made, would be woken by one of the players, ask Yogi what the situation was and then (depending on how much of what Yogi said sunk in) either make a decision or ask Yogi what he would do (and then do that).

I've heard coach speak for decades. If either of the two passages in question were attempts at coach speak (talking in a circle to say nothing while answering a question he doesn't want to answer), they were coach speak from someone with no background in the subject matter and little experience in fielding questions. I find it alarming that he couldn't get around what he was attempting to get around without sounding like a buffoon. He's been doing this for too long.

I also realize that it is quite possible for a competent person to misspeak on occasion. I do find the comments on Gifford and the two weeks on a row getting behind to be cause for concern however as either the former was a very blatant misstatement (and Gifford has been taking second unit reps, when fully healthy for the time he has been the #2 LT) which for a head coach is not much different from a department manager not remembering which of his employees has what responsibilities or we are running our practices differently than what has been the standard for more than half a century (in and of itself not necessarily an issue but the results do speak volumes of the effectiveness) employed by basically every successful college football program. The Temple statement however is just mind-boggling on how he can be so clueless on what happened a week earlier. If a head coach doesn't know this, I don't know what to say.

i only read the first line. super is a great spot for a dog! went there like once a week for lunch back in hs.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,379
Messages
4,569,353
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom