Honestly we have a team that is playing respectfully on the defensive line , secondary, linebackers, and wide receivers/tight ends and quarterback . Really need the offensive line to step up to an "average" level and I think this team can be gamers. Not judging the running backs because they are so dependent on the line blocking. I am optimistic that this can be patched up. Looking forward to seeing them in Tampa!
Despite the line issues there have been more long exciting plays from multiple running backs than we've seen the last 3 years.Honestly we have a team that is playing respectfully on the defensive line , secondary, linebackers, and wide receivers/tight ends and quarterback . Really need the offensive line to step up to an "average" level and I think this team can be gamers. Not judging the running backs because they are so dependent on the line blocking. I am optimistic that this can be patched up. Looking forward to seeing them in Tampa!
That headline needs to be redone - Where is the evidence on the field?
That headline needs to be redone - Where is the evidence on the field?
That's the point. The same institutions have different teams, coaches, and philosophies from when they all last met head to head. I probably didn't make my point as succinctly as I could have, but bottom line is that the transitive property does not work well in college sports.I'm confused by your point - USF coach was NOT in place when we played NCSt. Last year was his first year.