A'ja is the number one option in her offense, and like most forwards, her responsibilties on court are far less than any guard. Plus she's what, four or five inches taller? Forwards are worthless without someone who gets them the ball. I'm not saying A'ja isn't a candidate for ROY, but good guards are harder and rarer to come by. To me good guards win championships, not forwards.
I would make the argument that "good point guards/facilitators" are harder and rarer to come by, not necessary good guards.
Also, if you look at recent history, 6 out of the last 8 WNBA Finals MVP winners were forwards or centers, not guards.
To counter the argument about A'ja Wilson, yes, she IS the number one option in her offense. But this means that she is the focal point of the opposing team's defense (and double teams). And since Las Vegas is last in the WNBA in three-point percentage, teams can sag off perimeter players and double down on Wilson. Yet she is still averaging 21.0 ppg and (on 46.6 percent shooting -- and if you take out her first game, she is shooting 51 percent from the field) and 7.7 rpg.
Kia Nurse is not the #1 option in NY. That player is Tina Charles, who is leading the entire WNBA in scoring and is 4th in rebounding, and who commands double teams and attention of the opposition's defensive schematics -- which allows Kia to have more open looks and better available shots to take, as well as clearing away space in the lines for Kia to drive and get fouled (and she has made her living at the foul line this year, getting there over 5 times per game and shooting over 96 percent).
And though Las Vegas now has Kayla McBride back to be the top perimeter player next to Wilson in the post, she is not "equal" to or in the same league as Tina Charles, in terms of who Nurse has as a teammate.
Again, there are multiple ways to look a rookie's numbers, the impact the rookie has on the team, etc. But this will be a great discussion to revisit at the All Star break, to see how this year's rookie class is performing.
Folks, some Stats 01: 4 or 6 games is hardly a representative sample.
Second, the rookies have an element of surprise somewhat. Later in the season, coaches and players have seen the rookies, and developed scouting reports for the roles they've undertaken. Let's see how they perform then.
I just posted my last comment above right before you posted,
@vowelguy . 100 percent agree.