At that point, yes I agree that would have worked.We were about to get the best TV deal we ever had. $1 billion+, and two schools bolted anyway.
The only thing that could have saved this conference was ND joining.
So if ND was never in the Big East how would things have played out differently?Notre Dame's position in the Big East was symptomatic of the problem: the Big East was a hodge podge of agendas.
Notre Dame's position in the Big East was symptomatic of the problem: the Big East was a hodge podge of agendas.
"Want" has nothing to do with it.At that point, yes I agree that would have worked.
However, if the 6 remaining schools want it bad enough, the Big East could still succeed. You have to be willing to look out 10-20 years. Right now, there is no trust between the football schools. The next one to bolt puts the final nail in the coffin.
So if ND was never in the Big East how would things have played out differently?
WANT has everything to do with it. Everybody wants instant gratification."Want" has nothing to do with it.
We could all want to stay together, and we could all decide to stay together, and still lose our BCS status.
The nail went in the coffin when Quse/Pitt left.
Were you trying to miss my point?WANT has everything to do with it. Everybody wants instant gratification.
It had 0.00% effect on the predicament the Big East is in today.
Possibly. But things that are symptomatic of an illness only arrive after you are ill. This did not cause, prolong or otherwise effect the illness. The entire BS on this board about Notre Dame is a way of not having to face up to the real problem, which is too many other programs have more fans who go to games, watch on TV, and donate funds. But that requires pointing the finger at ourselves, and not others.
I'd say ND not being a football member affected the stability of the football league, but ND being a member for other sports didn't have affect one way or the other.
Bizlaw, are you really saying that if ND wasn't an all sports member of the BE from the start that the conference would be in the same position it is today? I don't see how you can justify that statement. For one, we'd have had a much better TV contract which could have negated the lure of the ACC for BC, Miami and Va Tech. Second, the boys in Providence clearly could have benefitted from ND's impact on the league office. Who knows perhaps we could have had a better (maybe even successful) chance at snaring Penn State? Or, maybe we could have become the hunter rather than the prey. I couldn't disagree with you more on this point.
By the way, ND is the only team in any sport that plays every game on national TV (not regional but national) and this applies to the professional teams. Say what you want about whether this is deserved or not but you can't ignore the ramifications of it.