Yep, just like the same fans are using the fact that UConn went to a BCS game in 2010 is evidence that the program had reached some pinnacle of greatness. That was a very mediocre team that finished tied for first in the worst BCS conference in history, and only finished tied for first because Bill Stewart handed UConn the single worst coached game I have ever seen. BTW, that UConn team lost to a Temple team by 2 TD's that is no where near as good as this year's edition of the same program.
Wins and losses are ultimately all that matter, but the "why" of the wins and losses is important for determining the right direction for the program. Or you could just say "this team sucks".
2010 was a 10-11 win quality team the gakked three games to the worst two teams in teams in the BE and a MAC also ran. If they played Michigan later in the season after everyone saw Denard a few more times, they could have won that game as well. 8-5 or not, as a whole that was the best Uconn FB team to date.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2
Why do only the last 4 count? What's wrong with his entire Big East track record? He had two winning seasons in the Big East, and one of those years the Big East went 3-12 in non-conference games against BCS competition.
He left the program with no FBS caliber QB or RB, mediocre WR's and no depth at offensive line. The cupboard wasn't quite bare, but there weren't too many unopened boxes either.
And of course this genius coach of yours lost his only head to head matchup against the coach you want to fire.
Pasqualoni has not done a good job, but the claims that the program was in great shape when he took over are idiotic.
The last four count because you said they didn't improve after 2003. By admitting the last four were better you prove your own point incorrect and idiotic.
Can you go two posts without contradicting yourself?
I hate UConn according to you, but here you are trashing the accomplishments of 2003-2010. But I'm the one who hates UConn. Right.
This is what it's come to? Not being that angry over a home loss to Temple?
Why do you hate UConn so much? Sorry the evidence continues to accumulate that Edsall did a good job here - it's telling that your reaction to it isn't a simple admission of this reality but rather you have doubled down on vitriol and spin.
What do you expect from a guy that predicted 2 wins for us in 2010, and because we ended up in the Fiesta Bowl he has decided to completely discount all of our BE wins from that year. By Nelson's math we've actually improved under Pasqualoni.
Did he really predict 2 wins in 2010?
What do you expect from a guy that predicted 2 wins for us in 2010, and because we ended up in the Fiesta Bowl he has decided to completely discount all of our BE wins from that year. By Nelson's math we've actually improved under Pasqualoni.
Said they wouldn't win again after the Temple loss. Something like 2-10 is on the table.
Please provide a link where, after getting shut out by Louisville, you predicted UConn would go to the Fiesta Bowl.
Actually it was after the Louisville loss. I underestimated just how bad the Big East was that year.
Good to see people are still bragging about that season as evidence of St. Randy's brilliance.
http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=322590120
You shouldn't show your hand with 'St. Randy'. It makes your intent too clear.
I can't wait until you blame the Big Rasy TB money on Pitt and ND.
On the Boneyard the Edsall haters have two links: Temple beat UConn in 2010 because Todman didn't hold onto the ball and the UConn defense beat Maryland in 2012 because the clock ran out.
Credit to Waylon that at least he is being honest - Edsall sucks blah blah blah. The king of pumping up the Big East has to bash it to denigrate Edsall. At least he isn't arguing both sides for a change.
Scoreboard.
I'm a UConn fan - unlike you who is a Big East fan but even an idiot like you knows that 'scoreboard' is easily argued with 'standings'
Shouldn't you be impressed that Maryland beat your beloved Owls.
Maryland's best win is considered a disastrous loss for UConn by you. Par for the course with your logic.
There are two people on the planet who don't think Temple sucks. You and the blogger who picked Temple over UConn 35-7 before they got Harris.
Yeah Maryland sucks with their true freshman QB and their future Heisman candidate who are 4-2. Edsall sucks - the Big East sucked blah blah blah.
Isn't there a Maryland board you can share this with?
On the Boneyard the Edsall haters have two links: Temple beat UConn in 2010 because Todman didn't hold onto the ball and the UConn defense beat Maryland in 2012 because the clock ran out.
Credit to Waylon that at least he is being honest - Edsall sucks blah blah blah. The king of pumping up the Big East has to bash it to denigrate Edsall. At least he isn't arguing both sides for a change.