JoePgh
Cranky pants and wise acre
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,759
- Reaction Score
- 22,140
Early in the week, shortly after the Oregon game, I posted here that the compressed schedule between the Elite 8 and Final Four probably had the effect of spotting Mississippi State a 10-point lead in the first Final Four game.
Following the loss, I've seen many diagnoses suggested here, but none of them mentioned that. I really think it was a major factor.
The Bulldogs beat Baylor last Sunday, so they had a full day in Starkville to strategize about UConn. I am sure that Coach Schaefer did not waste that time. In fact, he has probably been cogitating about how to defend UConn's offense for the last twelve months.
On Tuesday, his team had a relatively short bus trip from Mississippi to Dallas, which probably took less than half a day. UConn had a plane flight on Tuesday, which probably did not allow any practice time, and minimal think time, to prepare for the semifinal game in Storrs before they arrived in Dallas and participated in all that hoopla.
The fact that UConn's offense didn't run smoothly at all in the first quarter, and the Dawgs picked off several pass attempts, probably had to do with their painstaking preparation. Coach Schaefer, previously known as the Minister of Defense, is very good at that when he has time and has his team's attention. By the time UConn righted the ship, they were down 16 points. From the time that the score was 29-13 to the time it was 40-39 in favor of the Huskies in the middle of the third quarter, UConn outscored MSU 27-10. That probably reflected Geno devising countermeasures to the defense and the players settling down after initial nerves. After that, the game was very tight but MSU had an advantage because of UConn's foul trouble in the front court.
Those factors had much more to do with the loss than any referee's call in the last few minutes of the game. I completely agree with those who say that the referees did a generally good job and did not decide the game.
But I do think that the extra day of undisturbed game preparation by MSU had a very substantial impact on the outcome of the game.
Following the loss, I've seen many diagnoses suggested here, but none of them mentioned that. I really think it was a major factor.
The Bulldogs beat Baylor last Sunday, so they had a full day in Starkville to strategize about UConn. I am sure that Coach Schaefer did not waste that time. In fact, he has probably been cogitating about how to defend UConn's offense for the last twelve months.
On Tuesday, his team had a relatively short bus trip from Mississippi to Dallas, which probably took less than half a day. UConn had a plane flight on Tuesday, which probably did not allow any practice time, and minimal think time, to prepare for the semifinal game in Storrs before they arrived in Dallas and participated in all that hoopla.
The fact that UConn's offense didn't run smoothly at all in the first quarter, and the Dawgs picked off several pass attempts, probably had to do with their painstaking preparation. Coach Schaefer, previously known as the Minister of Defense, is very good at that when he has time and has his team's attention. By the time UConn righted the ship, they were down 16 points. From the time that the score was 29-13 to the time it was 40-39 in favor of the Huskies in the middle of the third quarter, UConn outscored MSU 27-10. That probably reflected Geno devising countermeasures to the defense and the players settling down after initial nerves. After that, the game was very tight but MSU had an advantage because of UConn's foul trouble in the front court.
Those factors had much more to do with the loss than any referee's call in the last few minutes of the game. I completely agree with those who say that the referees did a generally good job and did not decide the game.
But I do think that the extra day of undisturbed game preparation by MSU had a very substantial impact on the outcome of the game.