It’s because New England is full of great colleges, and UConn has never tried very hard to increase the endowment. In recent years, they’ve been pushing harder and getting more donations, but that’s not the way it was during the 50s 60s 70s 80s 90s and early 2000s.
USF is vastly better from a research perspective.
Besides the late start, the biggest issue with the the endowment relative to other schools is compounding of principal over decades. If you return 7% per year, your money will double in a decade.
they despite having the high end education don't really think smart, tulsa has a better chance than boise or memphis simply cause of academics, which is insanely stupid and limits them severely
It's always been a Cartel.
????
There are 18000 posts in the key tweets thread not a single one is a key tweet.
Tulane problem is they simply didn’t view sport’s as important to an educational institution. Memphis problem is they don’t view academics as important to an educational institution . The thing with a school like Tulane they can get back in the game with a smart investment In sports , with Memphis the hill is a lot steeper .
Worth a shot.
Not sure what's real or trolling here anymore, the California schools are horrible in the two sports that matter.
Half the ACC teams will never win a football or basketball ACC conference championship. Now you add Stanford those ACC schools won’t win an ACC championship in any sport. Stanford wins the Directors’ cup every year. They have 132 national championships.
It is not exactly a tough sell to recruit Olympic athletes to Stanford.
Way too many pro sports options in the Bay Area. In addition, most people go out and do stuff on weekends due to gorgeous weather vs. sitting at a football game. I am literally out every weekend playing tennis or Pickleball for example.
