Non-Key Tweets | Page 762 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

Why would the Big 10 or PAC 12 add a school at this time? The way consumers view content is rapidly changing and how we value the media value of schools is changing. Would the Big 10 have added Rutgers in today’s cable cord cutting world?

Texas and Oklahoma were no brainer adds for the SEC. Any school that is available now will be available in 5 to 10 years so why add more schools not named Notre Dame to a conference?
 
upstater said:
Why does the B1G need to weaken its financial package to respond to the SEC? It makes no sense.
Expand ...
BIG can offer partial share and make it viable.

Just thinking out loud. Can leagues offer base payout and include incentive laden payouts targeting football performance? Based on in-league wins, league championships, etc? Much like the NCAA bball approach.
 
bobbyinaz said:
There are reports circulating that the B12 minus UT & OK is worth half what it currently receives and that there are no B12 schools worth adding to the PAC in it's current configuration.

Yet, we're supposed to believe that Kansas is the school that will move the needle for the B1G?

IF, the B1G decides to expand it will not be with Kansas. Kansas has been the bitch of UT & OK for years. Now that those 2 are leaving Kansas all of a sudden grows muscles?
Expand ...
B1G has a huge perception of being a weak sister to the SEC in football right now. It was a weak sister already and now it's even weaker. Adding Kansas indeed reinforces the idea that B1G football is really weak, relatively.

It would be the exact opposite of what the B1G should be trying to do right now, which is to add USC and UCLA.
 
At the end of the day, the SEC had a unique opportunity to expand and grow its brand without diluting the product. There are no options readily available for the other conferences to do the same
 
MH ver3@MH ver3 45m
Pac12 presidents voted today and approved the league moving forward with exploring the financial benefits of merging or aligning with the B12 remnants. The vote was unanimous
 
hoopsfan22 said:
Why even bother with football at this point? In the last 20 years the top team was from the $EC other than that one random Ohio State championship a decade ago, and the ones from Florida State and Texas in the early 2000s.
Expand ...
I think Clemson ACC snuck in there also
 
upstater said:
Say what?

This is the biggest loser move in the history of college sports?

Are you kidding me?
Expand ...

Pretending for a minute that MH ver3 is not full of it... what would the harm being in exploring the financial value of the move, in fact the conference should absolutely do it.

There is no financial value add from any move to merge the conferences. If we can get free home and home schedule deals with the leftovers we can consider it for the savings. Exploration over.
 
ScottVib said:
Pretending for a minute that MH ver3 is not full of it... what would the harm being in exploring the financial value of the move, in fact the conference should absolutely do it.

There is no financial value add from any move to merge the conferences. If we can get free home and home schedule deals with the leftovers we can consider it for the savings. Exploration over.
Expand ...
The BE or UConn is one thing. I'd love to see us play Kansas.

The Pac10 would be associating themselves with something going under though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
1,240
Total visitors
1,426
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Share This Page

Forum statistics

Threads
164,040
Messages
4,379,913
Members
10,173
Latest member
mangers


.
..
Top Bottom