- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,801
- Reaction Score
- 351,378
Your list is nonsense since it doesn't include the health and safety of all those involved with football as one of the Top 5 concerns.My gut says Edsall knew he wouldnt find support in the state health administration for his program either. By support I mean having the state health officials create some sort of "football can be played under X protocols," exception.
So the reasons we aren't playing in no order:
i) liability
ii) lack of state support from a protocols / best practices standpoint from health officials (need this to bolster a liability defense)
iii) schedule - very limited ability to create a schedule that isn't pathetic...just look at BYU. ...and isn't loaded with expensive travel that offers zero revenue (these rescheduled games aren't coming with $$).
iv) the financial burden of added medical costs/testing adding....surely if we were playing our testing would have to be more rigorous
v) failure on the field - the distinct possibility that if key guys sit due to COVid we could actually look unimproved in 2020. <--not been discussed around here, but think about it for a moment, a very real risk.
Isn’t that a given? It is to meYour list is nonsense since it doesn't include the health and safety of all those involved with football as one of the Top 5 concerns.
That's was my point, it isn't a given for too many people. Leaving it off your list was weak.Isn’t that a given? It is to me
I dont talk about tomorrow by starting with "if the sun rises" because its a given.That's was my point, it isn't a given for too many people. Leaving it off your list was weak.
Everything on my list was absolutely sound.Then keep it clear of baseless conspiracy theories.
No attacks here, for our football season there are no sun rises only rainy days.I dont talk about tomorrow by starting with "if the sun rises" because its a given.
Agree, time will tell and reveal many answers. Are other medical advisors too dumb to recognize risks or are they financially motivated? There is a lot of gambling going on with young lives as the stakes and we are seeing those that want to hold and those that don't like the odds fold.Either we are exceptionally brilliant in ferreting out risks other medical advisors around the country are too stupid to recognize or we are out of step with reality. Time will tell.
My gut says Edsall knew he wouldnt find support in the state health administration for his program either. By support I mean having the state health officials create some sort of "football can be played under X protocols," exception.
So the reasons we aren't playing in no order:
i) liability
ii) lack of state support from a protocols / best practices standpoint from health officials (need this to bolster a liability defense)
iii) schedule - very limited ability to create a schedule that isn't pathetic...just look at BYU. ...and isn't loaded with expensive travel that offers zero revenue (these rescheduled games aren't coming with $$).
iv) the financial burden of added medical costs/testing adding....surely if we were playing our testing would have to be more rigorous
v) failure on the field - the distinct possibility that if key guys sit due to COVid we could actually look unimproved in 2020. <--not been discussed around here, but think about it for a moment, a very real risk.
Was an 802 Conference requested?
I like Chief a lot. I really do. But how can you think CT HS would ever play after Uconn punted. Not saying I agree with Uconn punting but once they did it was over.
And then you have states like PA where high school kids are playing, Temple is playing, Pitt is playing, but it's not safe for PSU to play.