It’s operated by the NCAAIMO they should have limited the NIT to 1 team per P6 conference not given them 12 of the 32 spots guaranteed… who even owns the NIT? It’s not run by the NCAA, right? Is it like the CFP where it’s owned by the conferences?
Names and games from the past. I sure remember Trent Tucker bombing away at the Hartford Civic Center with Minnesota. Lindsey Hunter had a great game against UConn at Gampel as well. There was also the quick guard Rashad Phillips from Detroit Mercy in 2001.As did Trent Tucker. But that was before we got good.
Yes, but you said it yourself, a train wreck. I'd be more inclined to be interested in mid majors who got snubbed than freakin.....checks notes....16-19 Ohio state who would have made it this most recent season with the new criteria. Higher qualitly of bball between two 25+ win solid mid majors who just happened to lose in the finals.I mean... I'd be more likely to tune into that trainwreck than a Jacksonville State vs Southeast Missouri State game...
I really don't think there will be that huge of an uptick in revenue by replacing some 26-7 Horizon vs 24-8 Big West match up with a match up that now has 14-18 Rutgers vs 15-18 Mississippi in its place. Most of the time these p6 teams don't even care about the NIT (unc declined this recent year) but can be huge for smaller conferences.A bad decision that would spur an even worse one.
Is Emmert still on the NCAA payroll as a consultant for this?
So did Andy Kennedy IIRC.Lindsey Hunter lit us up in the NIT
Lindsey Hunter lit us up in the N
In StorrsLindsey Hunter lit us up in the NIT
It just further screws the little guys and deincentives the regular season UNLESS the little guys either send regular season champs as their auto bid for the NCAAT OR give the 1 seed a bye to the finals or top 2 seeds byes to the semi finals (and seeds 3 and 4 to the quarters), or something like that. I hope this isn't a sign of things to come for the NCAAT
Where do they have it now?They ruined it by moving the final away from MSG That was the only reason it was fun - a chance to go to the big apple for fans and the teams
But that is their choice!That's the speculation. Still this blows. No teams get screwed more than regular season champs from small conferences who don't win the tournament. Regular season should >> conf tournaments.
Sure. But it’s a choice every major conference makes knowing there is no cost for them. I do think the small conferences should go with the regular season champ, but this is the NIT. They don’t even want them in the NIT.But that is their choice!
The conferences decide the allocation of the automatic bid. They typically reserve it to the tourney champ to keep their tournament relevant.
They could give it to the regular season champ should they come to agree with you.
I found this on wikipedia.Where do they have it now?
Big East has always been considered a power conference in basketball.This obviously sucks but it’s nice, for once, to be considered a power conference.
On the surface, yes. But I’ve never seen, in writing, the NCAA classifying the BE in the same category as the other power conferences. They now are.Big East has always been considered a power conference in basketball.
GIven win shares are more likely when you send your best team, I"d think this would be top of the agenda for conferences that don't have divisions. And would probably lead those that do to eliminate divisions.It’d be something if this triggered all smaller conferences to cancel their conference tournaments.