- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 667
- Reaction Score
- 2,989
And they’re gonna stink with 1 good player. Why not give 4 starters half a mill each instead.
That is my question, too. It seems like it's a poor allocation of resources. Now, having said that, I don't know how much the other 4 starters and bench players are being paid in relation to how good they are. If they are getting paid much less and are mediocre players, the coaching staff of University of Washington might have the idea in their head that Great Osoboor can be the 1 man team that puts the others on his back and carries them to an NCAA berth and then hope good luck hits them once in they are in the Big Dance.And they’re gonna stink with 1 good player. Why not give 4 starters half a mill each instead.
That's hilarious.
Like a Helms Bakery cheese danish?Go ahead spend a billion bucks for all I care, while we remain hungry. Could a team spending the most NIL money win it all sure but it would be a cheesy title.
This all seems like a well planned move to strengthen the power of the biggest of the "P" leagues. They get the most money on media rights, use it to buy the best players, and vanquish the "lesser" leagues and their teams.I don't see how this stays without some kind of cap and more importantly, some kind of revenue sharing among all the sports at a university. Paying the kids is accepted now but it's going to have to be paying all the kids that play sports at a school not saying evenly but I think they would all have to benefit otherwise the system will be up for legal attack? I think the cap will need to be put in place to try and level the playing field so that we aren't left with 30-40 schools dominating NCAAF and NCAAB. But NIL and collectives are only part of the issue for us, I expect that media rights deals will go up in value and may soon generate $100+ million of annual revenue to the "power schools" - - at some point, the deficit for UConn may be insurmountable and this means not only not being able to pay "market" for players but also for coaches and staff and not being able to maintain and improve facilities.
What is the governmental interest in requiring/allowing there to be a salary cap?I don't see how this stays without some kind of cap and more importantly, some kind of revenue sharing among all the sports at a university. Paying the kids is accepted now but it's going to have to be paying all the kids that play sports at a school not saying evenly but I think they would all have to benefit otherwise the system will be up for legal attack? I think the cap will need to be put in place to try and level the playing field so that we aren't left with 30-40 schools dominating NCAAF and NCAAB. But NIL and collectives are only part of the issue for us, I expect that media rights deals will go up in value and may soon generate $100+ million of annual revenue to the "power schools" - - at some point, the deficit for UConn may be insurmountable and this means not only not being able to pay "market" for players but also for coaches and staff and not being able to maintain and improve facilities.
Conference.I don't see how we'll be able to compete in the NIL era, there's certainly no way we'll ever win back to back championships in dominating fashion
Love your post I find it amusing how every day I see something about putting a salary cap on NILWhat is the governmental interest in requiring/allowing there to be a salary cap?
In essence...why should the government interfere with the free-market?