- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,475
- Reaction Score
- 36,040
It's not about NBA teams or scouts. It's about building a brand and being known going into the league.I don't think being on television matters with NBA teams
It's not about NBA teams or scouts. It's about building a brand and being known going into the league.I don't think being on television matters with NBA teams
Yes, we may disagree. To me it's less about the 11 FS1 games being equivalent to the ESPN games (we agree, they're not), and more about 8 regular broadcast TV games which are in the "primetime" of the college basketball week being so much better than being on ESPN. Like a lot of people are going to watch some B1G game on CBS in the early afternoon, then Kentucky Alabama on CBS and then UConn Nova primetime on Fox. Or UConn-Marquette before Michigan St/Michigan, both on Fox. Meanwhile Duke is lost in the shuffle playing on ESPN2 both days.Yeah, I think we're going to disagree in terms of exposure. ESPN may be in a terminal decline, it seems, but for the time being they still control the sports narratives, particularly CBB. It's where the hype comes from, and if you're only doing one year, getting that narrative I think helps.
While Fox Sports may be in as many households as ESPN, we all know there's a difference in viewership numbers just in terms of games, not getting into the rest of the talking head shows, etc.
Great is quite the stretch. We have used it to fill in holes. But this will be quite the jump. Hurley has shown the ability to adapt and I expect him to do the same here.
Hey. You need to give Duke some credit too! Zion, Barrett and Reddish were 3 of the top 4 recruits in the country and hyped as part of the greatest class ever. That group was life and death with Tacko Fall’s UCF in the second round, needed a miracle to survive, and came up short of the FF to Michigan State.Same way Kentucky has the last 10 years.![]()