MilfordHusky
Voice of Reason
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,432
- Reaction Score
- 127,692
Is she the daughter of the former Dukie?Isabella Alarie who plays at Princeton has a EDD type of game.
Is she the daughter of the former Dukie?Isabella Alarie who plays at Princeton has a EDD type of game.
Seems that way. Daughter of Mark Alarie.Is she the daughter of the former Dukie?
Saw EDD play several times at Delaware and at this point, would say Gustafson is playing at a more consistent level. Went to several games where EDD only scored in single digits first 3 quarters. Usually ended with 25-35 points. EDD, particularly in college, was not very strong, had issues with Lyme's Disease, and seemed to pace herself against poor competition. Today she is much better player than in college.I too watched the Iowa vs Indiana game and was impressed with Gustafson. But she is no EDD. MAKE NO MISTAKE.
What she is , is a good and solid college player. Strong . Methodical . And has a WNBA future as a power forward. Unable to defend out on the perimeter , but able to take up space in the paint and rebound. Good form on her shot out to the FT line and elbow. Good low post player.
But she is no EDD.
EDD at her best could not replace Crystal as a PG in the current UCONN line up nor could she replace the perimeter defense that Kia Nurse provides.EDD college version could replace any of the UConn's current starting 5. Who can Gustafson replace? Definitely not Z as the first sub of the bench.
Actually EDD couldn't replace any of Uconn players as she was and is not as good defensively if that is the focus.
EDD at her best could not replace Crystal as a PG in the current UCONN line up nor could she replace the perimeter defense that Kia Nurse provides.
Also don't think EDD can replace the defensive versatility and offensive setup skills of Gabby. EDD could however replace both KLS and and Napheesa Collier in the current UCONN lineup or Azura as the sixth man.
On the current UCONN team Gustafson could replace Napheesa because she has the shooting percentage to match (leading the country in scoring) and provide more rugged rebounding (5th in the country) and is better/taller post defender. Gustafson could also replace Azura as the UCONN 6th man because Azura's 3 point shooting has proven to be less than neth. Gustafson is also a better finisher than Azura and has a more diverse set of offensive moves at the basket. Azura is a much more dynamic passer and overall better suited for UCONN's offense but in reality next year they could be dynamic together if Gustafson were at UCONN.
Interesting side note: Had EDD decided to stay at UCONN she would have been joining a starting line up with Maya, Tina, Renee, & Kalana Greene. Would this have been the best starting 5 UCONN ever had?
That is not consistentent with my recollection of having attended more than 30 Delaware home games while EDD was playing there. The Delaware offense began with,was run through & ended with EDD all the time every time. There really wasn't that much for a coach to figure out.EDD is one of the 2 or 3 greatest players in WCB history. She was a great offensive player and an excellent rebounder and defender. At Delaware she was at a disadvantage because her coaching couldn't figure out how to run the offense through her all the time. Because of her versatility there were many ways to do it but the opponent was allowed to take her out of the offense way too much. With a little better supporting cast and better coaching she would have been devastating almost all the time.