NewsOk: The Big 12 Conference should have listened to Kevin Weiberg | Page 2 | The Boneyard

NewsOk: The Big 12 Conference should have listened to Kevin Weiberg

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Texas had played nice in the sandbox, think of what the Big 12 could have been..........go back to the days of the SWC. Assuming that the SWC and Big 8 inevitably joined forces for TV money anyways, Arkansas could have still been in the picture and joined the Big 12 at its formation.

If Texas had continued playing nice in the sandbox, none of the other teams would have sought out other conferences. If Texas could have led the way to spear a movement to have designated North-South rivals, it would most likely have happened. This means Oklahoma and Nebraska would have played every year as they did in the past. Not saying Nebraska would have stayed in the Big 12 with a Big Ten invite, but it sure would have been more like "home" if they had Oklahoma as a yearly rival and Texas playing nice.

Now, let's assume the Big 12 also moved to 14 schools like the B1G, SEC and ACC..........you would have had the original Big 12 plus Arkansas plus one other school (assume TCU here).

That would have been a formidable conference, even though it would still lack a population base outside of Texas. However, that grouping would have been strong, thus making it likely that other schools might have wanted to join from the ACC, such as Florida State and Clemson.

That could have been one heck of a football conference in that scenario. Certainly better than everyone outside of the SEC.

Texas-Texas A&M-Oklahoma-Nebraska-Arkansas-Florida State-Clemson - 7 traditionally strong football schools

Baylor-TCU-Kansas State-Oklahoma State-Missouri - 5 traditionally middle of the pack schools that all have had moments of greatness that could rise up to a higher level from time to time

Kansas-Iowa State-Colorado-Texas Tech - 4 traditionally weaker football schools, but every conference has a group of bottom feeders.

Now, imagine that those schools formed a conference network. Maybe not as large a population base as the BTN or SEC Networks, but certainly nothing to sneeze at either.

The Big 12 had great potential that Texas didn't want. Texas had to be the alpha dog.
 
On the flip side, we could argue the same thing with the B1G.

Nebraska and Notre Dame both wanted to join decades ago. Imagine what having those great Nebraska and Notre Dame teams would have done to the B1G and the dynamic with Ohio State-Michigan over the decades.

Texas - yes TEXAS - inquired about joining the Big Ten back when the SWC was on its last legs, but the B1G said it would not expand for at least a few years since Penn State had just been added. There would have been no talk about demographics in the B1G the past quarter century had Texas been in the conference ----- if Texas was capable of being an equal partner. That could have been interesting to see play out.

Now, assume both Texas and Nebraska were in the B1G --- Oklahoma would have no doubt wanted in the B1G. Would the B1G make an academic exception for the Sooners? It's possible.

Imagine a B1G with Ohio State/Michigan/Penn State/Nebraska/Notre Dame/Texas/Oklahoma - 7 flagship football schools. If the B1G wasn't so conservative until recently, this very well could have played out.
 
We would all have been better off had the Pac-16 happened. 5 Cartel leagues still as the B12 and BE remnants would have merged, and the networks would have overpaid for that hot mess too. Nobody left out at the very least.
 
Hypothetical:

If BIG12 offerred UCONN (to give WVU a closer travel partner) would UCONN accept?

I say YES!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,336
Messages
4,565,337
Members
10,465
Latest member
agiglax


Top Bottom