FfldCntyFan
Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 14,368
- Reaction Score
- 54,157
Please elaborate.Benedict is everything that's wrong with college sports.
Please elaborate.Benedict is everything that's wrong with college sports.
Dan Hurley would’ve been here regardless of Benedict or not. In fact, if Benedict got his wishes we would’ve probably hired Jeff Capel.Please elaborate.
Genuine question what would you like him to do differently? He's delivering championships level programs along with competitive football with a deck massively stacked against him with the current financial model. I understand a degree of being upset with forever seats I liked my seats too but if that is what it takes to drive more money into the program than that is what it takes.Dan Hurley would’ve been here regardless of Benedict or not. In fact, if Benedict got his wishes we would’ve probably hired Jeff Capel.
I credit him taking a big swing on Jim Mora. Other than that he’s handled conference realignment, treating the fans, and promotions like a 3 year old.
I’m not mad about the forever seats, it’s a typical scumbag big business move. We all should’ve seen it coming.Genuine question what would you like him to do differently? He's delivering championships level programs along with competitive football with a deck massively stacked against him with the current financial model. I understand a degree of being upset with forever seats I liked my seats too but if that is what it takes to drive more money into the program than that is what it takes.
Do you post under two handles? Perhaps you can read Champ's mind.Dan Hurley would’ve been here regardless of Benedict or not. In fact, if Benedict got his wishes we would’ve probably hired Jeff Capel.
I credit him taking a big swing on Jim Mora. Other than that he’s handled conference realignment, treating the fans, and promotions like a 3 year old.
No haha just this one. But I have heard a completely different story on the bolded portion, very good sources higher up at the University.Do you post under two handles? Perhaps you can read Champ's mind.
For the record, you are dead wrong on the first statement. DB defied the school's trustees in order to move to secure landing Hurley before he landed at Pitt.
His presentation to fans can be called into question (forever seats being a major issue) but in his defense on overall fan issues, there is a very large part of our fan base that expects P2 results while providing a G5 level of commitment. Believe it or not, the athletic department needs money to operate.
After having a few months to digest this situation, I am not sure how they could have made a significant improvement to the process. Gampel needed an upgrade and XL upgrades were essentially outside UConn control. They could have decided not to reduce the number of seats at Gampel but it is clear that they big donors were calling for better seats. I can't say I blame them. For almost $2000/year per seat, something better than those plastic seats was warranted.No haha just this one. But I have heard a completely different story on the bolded portion, very good sources higher up at the University.
I think people need to divorce the idea of P2 results from what we’re doing and spending. We can’t keep up with that spending, we are tactically navigating those waters. So that’s why none of this seat selection and donation scam comes as a surprise to me. I just wish they were more honest about all of it.
Haven't heard anything but I would not remotely count on these being your forever seats. Especially as Gampel eyes a more serious renovation next summerI saw this interesting question asked on the women's board - in subsequent years, are we keeping the same seats we just purchased, or are we going back to the older system where they're reassigning us seats (or reshuffling the entire building every year)? Anyone here hear anything about this?
There was a section in the FAQs that sort of addressed it. See below.Haven't heard anything but I would not remotely count on these being your forever seats. Especially as Gampel eyes a more serious renovation next summer
Anything is possible but I don't think we see another reseat for awhile.The earliest would be in 3 years I think and even then I doubt they will. The renovations they are looking to do would be more adding to the buildingI saw this interesting question asked on the women's board - in subsequent years, are we keeping the same seats we just purchased, or are we going back to the older system where they're reassigning us seats (or reshuffling the entire building every year)? Anyone here hear anything about this?
yeah it was the lower bowl people that got a little screwed.Had my time slot (Gampel) this morning (6/12) at 10 am. Didn't donate anything more and got the same exact seats. Section 223, Row G.
AgreedNo haha just this one. But I have heard a completely different story on the bolded portion, very good sources higher up at the University.
I think people need to divorce the idea of P2 results from what we’re doing and spending. We can’t keep up with that spending, we are tactically navigating those waters. So that’s why none of this seat selection and donation scam comes as a surprise to me. I just wish they were more honest about all of it.
Biggest problem with college sports is that it's now pro sports.That’s quite an accusation. Care to elaborate?
Not much in the way of elaboration.Biggest problem with college sports is that it's now pro sports.
He nails the two most important hires and has increased revenues incredibly. That's the job.DB did not believe there was an acceptable second choice if he couldn't land Danny.
I'm an alumni so I'm going to donate extra, but moving forward it's going to be to sent to academics.I picked this morning - I am Civic Center only. I did not donate more so I had low expectations coming into the process. I became increasingly optimistic as the weeks passed and so many of the 200 level seats were still available. As of yesterday, not only were my forever seats - which I considered the absolute best value level seats at HCC - still available, but quite a few around my seats were still available.
That completely changed by the end of the day yesterday. My seats were gone and there was just one pair left of what I would consider comparable. And by the time my window opened at 11:30AM this morning that pair was gone and I was down to just picking the best available.
So the process ended for me the way I thought it would have gone. After putting my seats in the cart and waiting the full half hour, I contemplated just letting them go but decided to just take what I can get.
I have no complaints because while I have been a season ticket holder for both basketball and football for many years, I do not donate all that much compared to other people. So I feel like I got what I deserved.
I do feel bad for those that got screwed by the process and certainly agree that the AD could have handled this better. But, honestly, as much as I love the Huskies, it is stuff like this that keeps me from donating more.
They just sent me an email this morning. If you change your mind I’m sure you probably got it too.I'm an alumni so I'm going to donate extra, but moving forward it's going to be to sent to academics.
FfldCntyFan said: Please elaborate.Benedict is everything that's wrong with college sports.
all I've gotten this week is an email about the FB home schedule announcement, and a invitation to elect alumni trustee candidates from the UConn Foundation. I did get a donation request last Saturday from the Husky Athletic Fund, sorry fellas not happening.They just sent me an email this morning. If you change your mind I’m sure you probably got it too.