New ESPN article on Sarah Strong | The Boneyard

New ESPN article on Sarah Strong

Hey, where is that nit we need to pick?
She normally writes greats articles. I picked the nit because her using descriptions like that are unusual.
 
Bet Geno's glad (and we By'ers) that there's not "one and done" in women's BB unlike on the men's side.

So how long will it be before the W changes their rule of players must be 22 or set to turn 22 during the calendar year of the draft and American born players must spend four years at the collegiate level if under age of 22? With the way the women's game has grown and the ever stronger physical attributes of young women in sports today how much longer will that rule last? I predict it won't be long.
 
Bet Geno's glad (and we By'ers) that there's not "one and done" in women's BB unlike on the men's side.

So how long will it be before the W changes their rule of players must be 22 or set to turn 22 during the calendar year of the draft and American born players must spend four years at the collegiate level if under age of 22? With the way the women's game has grown and the ever stronger physical attributes of young women in sports today how much longer will that rule last? I predict it won't be long.
When they start making millions to play professionally someone will sue as Spencer Haywood did years ago, and they will have to change their rules.
 
Thank God Alexa is not writing for Sports Illustrated. Then we'd be doomed. Good on her. She did a great job while in Hartford.
 
If you want to nit pick, what the heck does she mean by “SOON to be star”? What more does Sarah have to do to be a star?
 
When they start making millions to play professionally someone will sue as Spencer Haywood did years ago, and they will have to change their rules.
Juju is already advocating for this in interviews.
 

Online statistics

Members online
226
Guests online
1,944
Total visitors
2,170

Forum statistics

Threads
164,113
Messages
4,382,548
Members
10,185
Latest member
aacgoast


.
..
Top Bottom