Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dogdeacon, post: 3089993, member: 1026"] Don't answer any of my questions ever, just keep pivoting and hammering at the totally incomparable allegation that Calhoun was treated differently. However, I will point out that Calhoun, VOLUNTARILY stepped down with the pending probation and that ultimately created a better transition and exit circumstance for UConn & Calhoun - with heavy qualifier that the better circumstance became worse when Ollie stopped doing his job. Everyone thinks UConn admin put some pressure on Calhoun to step away, if that's ok for a coach that built the program up from a Dom Perno disaster that almost makes Kevin Ollie look competent (see Kelley, Earl) than certainly getting rid of a coach that did far less and became far worse is more than justifiable. To wit. none of the Ollie sycophants think he should have remained as a head coach. IF OLLIE DID ENOUGH TO WARRANT HIS REMOVAL AS HEAD COACH (THE SYCOPHANTS AGREE), HE SHOULDN'T BE PAID FOR BEING THE HEAD COACH. Or am I being too obtuse ;) [/QUOTE]